Posted on 09/06/2009 10:00:17 PM PDT by Boucheau
***Contains Graphic Images of Communists in Actions Against Humanity***
Thanks for providing that link. Here are the rest of them, for anyone who is interested.
The Bloody History of Communism:
14 Videos in all:
1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIeics8jHUY
2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPaz9ztzFTA&feature=related
3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH0cPdKRZNs&feature=related
4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JC3NGZ4dfrk
5. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkWwdyqIK28&feature=related
6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAbimgh3mK0
7. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j17l3CVRbaI&feature=related
8. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_w0-odySN4
9. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oR_U96XZPs
10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZs423K7B5k
11. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_2GdCEBCQg
12. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zeNja6SuXc
13. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xAYthFpCZw&feature=fvw
14. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpybtygjU4k
Ping for later.
Bookmark
Bookmark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I oppose Health Care Reform (HCR) because it is a direct assault on individual liberties. I think that is its main purpose.
That means that health care providers have no individual rights. The collective right of the people to receive health care would supersede the provider's individual right to set their fees, their hours or change their occupational status or even decide how to apply their skills and knowledge. A collective right, by practical definition, is a state right because it is a right that is provided by the government to all not protected by the government as something possessed by each person. It is also a state right because it supersedes the individual rights of others when the two come into conflict.
It isn't stated in any of the bills that a patient's rights to care supersedes a provider's right to set fees and hours etc, but it doesn't need to. Rights are always adjudicated in the courts. The legislation simply establishes the foundation for the courts to rule in favor of the patient's collective right to health care.
Weiners view is collectivist, fascist and totalitarian. Collectivist because it is superior to an individual right. Fascist because it is overseen by one entity the Federal government. Totalitarian because the Federal government is the true possessor of this collective right and the administrator and enforcer of it as well.
Congressman Weiner's view is the underlying philosophy of the entire Health Care Reform legislation the House and Senate have put forth. Consider the setting up of community watch dogs to monitor various health parameters of citizens in the Senate version of the bill. Look at pages 382 - 393.
TITLE IQUALITY, AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE FOR ALL AMERICANS
Even the citizens themselves will be subject to state set regulations on their behavior in order to fulfill the human right of universal health care. It isn't the individual's liberty that is being protected by that it is the state's control over its health care system that is being guarded. How much clearer can it be that these bills abrogate the concept of individual rights?
Health Care is a Liberty Issue Conservative Underground - 18 August 2009 - Tim Dunkin
Second Bill of Rights aka FDR's economic bill of rights (An early attempt to embed collective rights into American politics and society.)
Excellent!
Thank you very much for that. My printer is warming up now. :)
“Tell me, if we had the chance to do it all again, would we? Could we?”
That is SO wrong, but accurate...and weird.
Ouch, my brain hurts now.
Thank you very much. Thank you also for reminding me; I promised to print out a copy for my Mom to read. (ahem, two days ago, TE)
Bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.