Skip to comments.
Ex-child star says he's the father of Jackson's daughter
CTV.ca ^
| Sun. Aug. 9 2009
| Staff
Posted on 08/09/2009 4:16:25 PM PDT by canuck_conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: canuck_conservative
I'm the Daddy!
21
posted on
08/09/2009 4:40:22 PM PDT
by
Krankor
To: Lizavetta
22
posted on
08/09/2009 4:50:16 PM PDT
by
Richard Kimball
(We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
To: DryFly
Never heard of him so did a search, cough. Glad you posted the clothed image.
23
posted on
08/09/2009 4:52:01 PM PDT
by
bgill
(The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
To: canuck_conservative
freakazoids...robots...please report to the dance floor ...
24
posted on
08/09/2009 4:52:56 PM PDT
by
AHerald
("Behold, your mother." And from that hour the disciple took her into his home -- John 19:27)
To: 3niner
So none of the kids are biologically related—the older son is the child of Rowe and the doctor, the daughter comes from Lester’s sperm and a donor egg, and allegedly the younger son is Jackson’s and an unknown surrogate, who herself may not be the biological mother.
25
posted on
08/09/2009 5:00:33 PM PDT
by
Burkean
To: ConservativeMan55
Nope! Paris has dark hair and a darker complexion. We know Debbie is blonde and light complected and so is Lester.
26
posted on
08/09/2009 5:04:33 PM PDT
by
Spunky
(You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences.)
To: RichInOC
27
posted on
08/09/2009 5:06:37 PM PDT
by
Cedar
To: Spunky
I thought I'd read somewhere that Debi Rowe or whatever her name was was not the egg donor, that essentially she just rented her womb out. That's not correct?
If it is true, though, Paris' different coloring could have been provided by the bio mom. I have to say the 2 girls' bone structures offer some intriguing similarities to my eye, unschooled though it is, except for some training in sculpture.
But hey, it might not have even been necessary that the egg donor was brunette at all, since this is Michael Jackson's wacky household and we know he was into 'expressing himself' cosmetically. Her darker coloring could have been provided by Clairol & Tan-in-a-Can at Dad's direction, for all we know.
28
posted on
08/09/2009 5:19:54 PM PDT
by
leilani
To: leilani
"I thought I'd read somewhere that Debi Rowe or whatever her name was was not the egg donor, that essentially she just rented her womb out. That's not correct?" Debbie Rowe is the biological mother of the first two children. There was a surrogate for the third child "Blanket"
29
posted on
08/09/2009 5:32:31 PM PDT
by
Spunky
(You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences.)
To: canuck_conservative
Must be commonplace in Hollywood. David Crosby donated his sperm for Melissa Etheridge’s two kids.
30
posted on
08/09/2009 5:32:49 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: Spunky
Well, I knew the third one had nothing to do with Rowe. But there seems to be some dispute that she was anything more than a surrogate for the first two who were allegedly conceived in vitro without the genetic contribution of either Rowe or Jackson.:
Jackson/Rowe Not The Bilogical Parents (via TMZ)
31
posted on
08/09/2009 5:39:06 PM PDT
by
leilani
To: 3niner
Unless the mother is a bottle blond
32
posted on
08/09/2009 5:51:03 PM PDT
by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: leilani
Not sure who or what TMZ is, but their assertion that Debi isn't the biological mother leaves a lot to be desired.
"Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there's a presumption that she's the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence. What evidence?
"We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it's still an open issue with the courts.
Where are these documents? Lets see them.
33
posted on
08/09/2009 5:55:39 PM PDT
by
Spunky
(You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences.)
To: Spunky
34
posted on
08/09/2009 6:06:11 PM PDT
by
leilani
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson