If ‘they’ were able to ‘dish it out’, during the campaign, with the IN YOUR FACE attitude, they shouldn’t be shocked, that they’ll reap what they sow.
The facts are that there are requirements to hold the office of the Presidency written in the Constitution and that these requirements are as important as anything else in it. Its like taking the Bible and picking out the things you like and doing them but not the others. Its pointless because like it or not the others are still there.
So, Glenn, why is 0bama hiding all of his records?
Nice catch. The article linked is well worth the read. This guy nails, head on.
Nice catch. The article linked is well worth the read. This guy nails it, head on.
An argument that is presented with little evidence (`Obama is eligible under Article II’) can be rebutted with little evidence—cough it up Barry.
Simply put, ANY talk show host, journalist, political analyst, etc. who even remotely affords any support whatsoever for the “Birther (better termed “Truther”) cause will run the risk of losing his /her job. This is why Hannity, Beck, O-Reilly, Ann Coulter, Geraldo, etc. will NEVER touch this issue. Dobbs was the example and I am convinced they were ALL told: “Want to keep your job ? Then limit the issues to policy criticism ONLY or you will wind up like Dobbs !”
Now my question is, are they getting BONUSES for resorting to childish name calling of the “Birther” movement ? Why else would these “professional, articulate and eloquent” broadcasters resort to such “demeaning” terms when referring to the eligibility enthusiasts ? If you’ve noticed, O’Reilly goes SO FAR out of his way to smirk and giggle in mid-sentence when he so much as even mentions the Dobbs issue while other broadcasters simply roll their eyes in disapproval ! This behavior is SO unnecessarily dramatic and condescending...HATE IT !
Policy criticism will NEVER be grounds for impeachment or a National upheaval, but the eligibility issue is just TOO HOT....so, in my opinion, their hands are tied.
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”