Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is it Too Late to Impeach Obama?
Vanity | Vanity

Posted on 07/25/2009 1:43:17 PM PDT by 2harddrive

It may be TOO LATE! There are now some constitutional/legislative “theologians” who say that even IF the DemocRAT votes COULD be found to impeach him, that Obama is legally UNIMPEACHABLE, if in fact he is not a natural-born American. They say that, because then he would never have been eligible to hold the office in the first place, and so is NOT the President, and thus CANNOT be impeached! The articles simply would NOT APPLY to him. If so, HOW would he be removed from the White House? Perhaps via an ordinary EVICTION process? Don't let the media bury this story!


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; constitution; impeachment; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
It may be TOO LATE! There are now some constitutional/legislative “theologians” who say that even IF the DemocRAT votes COULD be found to impeach him, that Obama is legally UNIMPEACHABLE, if in fact he is not a natural-born American. They say that, because then he would never have been eligible to hold the office in the first place, and so is NOT the President, and thus CANNOT be impeached! The articles simply would NOT APPLY to him. If so, HOW would he be removed from the White House? Perhaps via an ordinary EVICTION process? Don't let the media bury this story!
1 posted on 07/25/2009 1:43:17 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

Better late than never...


2 posted on 07/25/2009 1:47:07 PM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
Watch your blood pressure, and get used to the fact that, no matter what, Obama will be here for 4 years, minimum. There's no point in getting excited about him being unimpeachable, because there's absolutely zero chance that he would be impeached in the first place.

You should use your energy educating your children and neighbors about how our country is being changed and how we need to get rid of these statists.

3 posted on 07/25/2009 1:47:09 PM PDT by DJ Frisat (How's that change workin' out for ya, Obama voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: 2harddrive

ain’t gonna happen....have you forgotten he is still winning his battles? looks like obamacare will win, and cap and trade. why do thnk it possible to impeach the guy?


5 posted on 07/25/2009 1:47:57 PM PDT by devane617 (Republicans first strategy should be taking over the MSM. Without it we are doomed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

.."you fell again without your helmet right?"

6 posted on 07/25/2009 1:48:01 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive; Bender2

Slide your chair back from the desk and slowly move away from the keyboard. Don’t consume anymore caffeine today.


7 posted on 07/25/2009 1:49:37 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Anyone pushing Romney must love socialism...Piss on Romney and his enablers!!" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

Just call up immigration and have him deported to Mexico.
Maybe him and his leftie buddies from central America can corner and socialize the cocaine cartels.


8 posted on 07/25/2009 1:49:48 PM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
A sticky wicket, as the Brits might say.

And a damnable position for us to be in.

If he's not eligable to be President, but sits as such, I would think civil action without Congress would be sufficient .... any old magistrate from a red state ... or perhaps from DC itself.

If he IS legal, then I would think the Constitutional path is the way to go, 2/3rds and all that.

Interesting situation we got here, eh?

9 posted on 07/25/2009 1:49:59 PM PDT by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
So then ... an office holder who is deemed ineligible to hold such office cannot be removed after the fact because said office holder was ineligible in the first place?

Perfect circular logic :)

10 posted on 07/25/2009 1:50:19 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
It may be TOO LATE! There are now some constitutional/legislative “theologians” who say that even IF the DemocRAT votes COULD be found to impeach him, that Obama is legally UNIMPEACHABLE, if in fact he is not a natural-born American. They say that, because then he would never have been eligible to hold the office in the first place, and so is NOT the President, and thus CANNOT be impeached! The articles simply would NOT APPLY to him. If so, HOW would he be removed from the White House? Perhaps via an ordinary EVICTION process? Don't let the media bury this story!

Everyone that I know who pontificates on this subject says we are stuck with Slo Joe Biden. I have not heard that he cannot be impeached because he is not the President. If that is so, then the nation should be storming the White House and DEMAND HE MOVE OUT NOW.

SCOTUS will not become involved for two reasons - (1) they say there is only ONE way for removal and that is up to the Congress via IMPEACHMENT, and (2)SCOTUS took a beating by the lefties after the Bush v. Gore decision and hence do not want to step into another case deciding if the President is incorrectly sleeping in the WH.

Seems like SCOTUS better step up no matter what skin color the child messiah usurper in the WH has.
11 posted on 07/25/2009 1:50:38 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

I’d rather have the military arrest him and dump him in Nicaragua.

Just for kicks.


12 posted on 07/25/2009 1:50:49 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

Well, the first place to start is to ask the question — “Is Obama the President of the United States?”

That answer should be pretty simple, for most normal and rational people as everyone in that category knows he’s the President. But there are a few who say he’s not the President...LOL... Well, I know some people who say we didn’t land on the moon, too... :-)

Suffice it to say that fortunately for us, there are not very many nut cases who say Obama is not the President. They may be loud and noisy but they are not numerous.

Having said that about the President, the next step is that you have specified procedures for removing a President from office. That’s Impeachment by the House and Trial by the Senate. We’ve been through that before with Clinton so we know how that works... (you know... all the “ins and outs” of the procedure...)

So, yes, Obama can be Impeached, theoretically, but will he be Impeached... ummmm..., I doubt it...


13 posted on 07/25/2009 1:51:19 PM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

ping


14 posted on 07/25/2009 1:53:36 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
Just remove him from the WH. He was never a legitimate POTUS if he is not a natural-born citizen. Here is a better avenue of proving his non-elgibility:

SOME GOOD QUESTIONS

More questions and this time, they're really good questions.

I have little interest in getting into the middle of the Obama birth issue, but yesterday Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so and he believes the issue can be resolved by having Obama answer one simple question: How could a young man arrive in New York in early June 1981 without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly, only one month later, find the money for an around-the-world trip?

And, once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York, Jakarta, and Karachi, what passport was he carrying when he passed through U.S. Customs and Immigration?

The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, as concerned citizens, they must have the answers.

The ongoing debate over Obama's citizenship can now become a very short and simple one.

Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20? A : Yes, by his own admission.

Q: What passport did he travel with?

A: There are only three possibilities.

1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport,

2) He traveled with a British passport,

3) He traveled with an Indonesian passport.

Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled on a U.S. passport in 1981?

A: No, it is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's

"no travel" list in 1981.

Conclusion:

When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981, he was traveling on either a British or an Indonesian passport.

If he were traveling on a British passport, that would be proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, and not in Hawaii as he claims.

And, if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport, that would imply that he relinquished whichever citizenship he had held, British or American, prior to being adopted in 1967 by his Indonesian step-father .

Whatever the truth of this matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008..

Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as indicated by his speech before Congress, and his disastrous spending plan that Congress has passed, the sooner we learn the truth, the better.

If you don't care that your President has not proven that he is a natural born citizen, and may be in clear violation of the Constitution, then just delete this and go back into your cocoon.

If you do care, then send this to as many as you can!

Fred L . Languell Lcdr, USN, Ret

15 posted on 07/25/2009 1:53:56 PM PDT by Mogollon (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

As much as I fear the next 3.5 yrs, what “high crime of misdemeanor” do you think you can prove?,p>

At this point, talk of impeachment is nonsense.


16 posted on 07/25/2009 1:55:17 PM PDT by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
Lots of criminals lie. That does not make them immune to legal action. The supreme court could remove the president. Congress and the senate could remove the president. The Army could remove the president. McCain could be declared President. There are a lot of things that could happen. It is kinda simple minded to catastrophizing an imagined event.
17 posted on 07/25/2009 1:56:42 PM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf
Hmmmm ... as I ponder this .... consider;

A magistrate files an eviction notice because zero has not proven eligability to be a legal resident of the White House, reserved for exclusive use by a duly elected, LEGAL applicant for the job.

The applicant has not proven eligability and must vacate within 30 days (I know, in the real world, that could mean two years.)

But an eviction notice would be a legal demand for proof of eliganility ... which is ....

18 posted on 07/25/2009 1:58:15 PM PDT by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knarf
If he's not eligable to be President, but sits as such, I would think civil action without Congress would be sufficient .... any old magistrate from a red state ... or perhaps from DC itself.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Obama will fight the release of this information all the way to the Supreme Court. He will claim executive privilege.

19 posted on 07/25/2009 1:58:35 PM PDT by wintertime (People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

> If so, HOW would he be removed from the White House?

Probably in cuffs and at gunpoint. It’s not nice to occupy the White House illegally: fraud tends to be frowned upon in most polite societies.


20 posted on 07/25/2009 1:59:17 PM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson