NOW you are ignoring the difference between the parents. First of all, Sarah Palin was a candidate for Vice President of the United States, and the electorate wanted to know about her family. Second of all, Trigg is a special needs baby. She couldn't have very well left him in Alaska. Levi is an total no account, who's only claim to fame is dependent upon his girlfriend's momentary lapse in judgment.
I don't know where you are going with this anti-Sarah thing, but you can't twist utterly dissimilar things into some perverted argument whereby Sarah Palin somehow "had this coming", or was a hypocrite.
LOL What a laugh. I pointed out hypocrisy of posters on this thread regarding Levi and the Palin's not hesitating to use him for photo ops when he and Bristol were together and all of a sudden it's "anti-Sarah". That's rich.
...Trigg is a special needs baby. She couldn't have very well left him in Alaska.
She also didn't have to bring him out on stage to the din of cheering thousands but she chose to.
...but you can't twist utterly dissimilar things into some perverted argument whereby Sarah Palin somehow "had this coming", or was a hypocrite.
Now you are drawing conclusion based on your own irrationality. Nowhere did I say anything about Palin. I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the posters, you included. I did not read where the Palins said that Levi's media appearances were to be blasted - that came from you and others here.
Levi is an total no account, who's only claim to fame is dependent upon his girlfriend's momentary lapse in judgment.
Ah, well, since you know him so well it must be more than a "momentary" lapse since, if I recall correctly, they were together for some time.
It sounds more to me that you are having issues with this instead of the Palins. Maybe they are the bigger people in all this?