LOL, I will take that criticism. I have yet to be proven wrong on the topic, and with all of the the whacknuts claiming all this UFO crap and space-aien silliness is real, not one person could ever prove it is, and there have been millions of debunkings.
It’s amazing how nasty the idiots who run around slamming every “naysayer” can be when their team is approximately zero for a million at-bats. If I were on a team with a 100% perfect losing record, I don’t think I’d be so quick to criticize people, especially in the really nasty tone some of the whacknut UFO believers do.
I’ll give the whacknuts this, though, they do have some serious tenacity. And some serious temerity to call “naysayers” negative stuff when they hae absolutely no leg to stand on. Congrats to the perfect failures.
Actually, it is the naysayers who are the losers.
There are at least now 4,000 trace landing cases with scientific verification.
Many of the ‘famous’ naysayer ‘debunking’ junk is illogical; unfactual and clearly a disinfo exercise.
It’s now widely accepted that Sagan was a paid government shill debunker.
Naysayers’ addictions to TYPE II ERROR consequences in their blind, rigid, narrow, unthinking fleeing from a TYPE I ERROR straight into the lap of a GREATLY THEN MORE LIKELY, VIRTUALLY CERTIN TYPE II ERROR are most illogical, irrational, silly.
NO NAYSAYER HEREON HAS EVER HAD A REMOTELY FITTING OR STATISTICALLY ACCURATE RESPONSE TO THAT ISSUE. It’s a simple demonstrative fact. And naysayers come out persistently and ignorantly pontificating in ways that merely continue to deepen that fact.
BTW, I think you’ve been proven wrong on the topic multiple times.
It’s just that whenever a proof gets too troublesome to bear, the naysayer shucks and jives, slips and slides, throws personally assaultive and insulting rocks and runs and hides.
REALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLY IMPRESSIVE, THAT.
No naysayer hereon has ever made even a slight dent in the now 4,000 cases of landings that have left scientifically measureable trace evidences in the environment.
I actually think that the naysayers need to be composing their “mea culpa, awwww shucks we were WRONG!” speeches. The traitorous globalist oligarchy and the ET critters seem to be ramping up more and more rapidly, more and more overtly toward public disclosure.
Well, let me put it this way:
I don’t go where Quix goes a lot of the time, nor apparently TaraP, but I respect the search. In Quix’s case, he has a lot of raw and processed data to fall back on, and that earns my respect all by itself.
For my part, I’m an engineer, and work on our nation’s spaceships. I see some fairly high technology items, and some things that aren’t high-tech in themselves but rather are innovative approaches to apply ideas we’ve had in use for years. As I watch the development process, it is not hard for me to see that we will have the abilities that are ascribed to UFO’s someday.
(There are actually some pretty smart egghead-types working on credible Faster-than-light theories. Google ‘Alcubierre’.)
You may not agree with the way things are presented, or some of the religious links that some people make, but you chould look past all that with a logical eye. There is a lot to be seen. In a logical view, the idea of aliens, interstellar travel, and many other things are a matter of escalating technological progress. That’s all it really boils down to.
Friedman frequently points out one thing that, based on my own witness to the march of technology, makes perfect sense: What are the possibilities for technology for a race that is perhaps a million years older than we are, and how many races like that exist?
Personally, I think it will take us FAR less than a million years to have interstellar travel, including FTL.
Do you believe in God? If you do, provide proof that God exists. If you can't, then using your reasoning, that would mean that God doesn't exist, and that anybody who believes in God is a "whacknut". Atheists have claimed for centuries that God doesn't exist and so far nobody has proven them wrong.