Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: iThinkBig
Who should have the final say in issues on a global scale such as this?

On a "global scale such as this?" That's easy. The ones doing the experiment.

Because the only issue 'on a global scale' is the science that will be learned. The 'risk' of a non-evaporating black hole, or some other form of strange matter, is zero - to a lot of decimal places. The fact the evaporation of black holes is a theory is at least as solid as the theory that something bad will come of it.

If you choose to establish some global governance authority - whether it's the top ten banks or you sitting in your den - then that authority would be better off worrying about Wiccan circles chanting in the woods asking for some weird spiritual/magical effects. Those would also require an inversion of known science, and are more likely to occur than globally bad effects from the LHC.
7 posted on 02/12/2009 9:19:56 AM PST by Phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Phlyer

Any concerns about weaponizing such science?


9 posted on 02/12/2009 9:22:16 AM PST by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson