Posted on 12/29/2008 1:50:03 PM PST by dascallie
Posted below, but the point is, there is some contradictory evidence that O DID meet with Blag about the senate seat.
Everybody is in cahoots with everybody to protect O it seems:
>>I just do not get what is happening these days....we had two very clear news items posted on Tri Connect describing how O was to meet with Blag that afternoon, then a followup story AFTER the meeting took place.
Not to mention the now fading, soon to be forgotten, memory of Axlerod's very clear "I know he has talked with the govenor" etc... comment on video.
How did all this just vaporize as if it never occurred?<<
Maybe he’s a ‘rat lover?
Lying to voters is not against the law. Lying to prosecutors is. So as long as they say the right stuff to Fitz, they are clear..............
So what now?
We roll over?
It’s fairly easy when a despot surrounds himself with enough willing cannon fodder...
It’s an ongoing case. Besides, it’s pretty clear that Blago will drag team Zero into it one way or another.
We are talking evidence that recorded a meeting took place....what in the h is going on.
The O-Team may be getting nervous about Blago’s mouth..........
I’d just like to see some direct explanation or exploration of this, by the press, publicized meeting.
How in the world can that be swept under the rug?
After January 20th all 92 US Attorneys will submit their resignations to President Obama. Obama will then decide who to retain and who to replace. Patrick Fitzgerald wants to be retained.
If retained he will then be an employee of Attorney General Eric Holder (if he is confirmed) and Barack Hussein Obama.
so, does this require another law suit attempt ( like the bc suits) to try and get this out in the open?
This is most flagrant shell game i have ever seen—with a million witnesses ( or however many eyeballs saw the articles).
It is like O is so emboldened, his team is allowed to merely turn their heads and walk the other way.
It’s not Fitzgeralds job to talk about this.
It’s the media that is failing us.
Because merely meeting and talking to Blago about the Senate seat, how many ever times, is not a crime. Only if there is “pay to play” does it become a crime.
Obama denied doing it, does lying count?
No, legally it doesn’t count, he wasn’t under oath when he said it.
Do you really have to be under oath to obstruct justice?
Why doesn’t Patrick Fitzgerald care about this VANITY?
He doesn’t like vanities..........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.