Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Free ThinkerNY

Haven’t seen the movie, and don’t plan to.

Mr. Friedman seems to think any movie that doesn’t portray all Germans as the ultimate in evil, to the point where if Stauffenberg’s group had succeeded it wouldn’t have made any real difference, looks to me like a pretty good example of ethnic bias. Once the Nazis had come to power, those who opposed them would accomplish nothing but getting themselves and their families killed. The only hope was to kill Hitler, freeing the more honorable Germans soldiers from their personal oath of fealty.

A more legitimate criticism not pursued by Friedman is that Stauffenberg’s group didn’t begin its plotting until it became obvious Hitler was losing the war. They weren’t against Nazism as much as they were against Germany being destroyed.

There were “good Germans” who opposed Hitler on ideological grounds, but these guys weren’t among them.


10 posted on 12/26/2008 4:41:35 PM PST by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

What is it they say about success having many fathers but failure being an orphan?


13 posted on 12/26/2008 4:44:51 PM PST by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
The aristocrats in the German army merely got sick of a commoner (and a corporal at that) running an incompetent war. It was that simple.

Cruise as Stauffenberg is just plain laughable.

24 posted on 12/26/2008 5:17:59 PM PST by Clemenza (Red is the Color of Virility, Blue is the Color of Impotence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson