[mysterio]

Your assertion that I'm committing a type II error depends on you being right about space monsters.

You can become one of the most famous and wealthy people of all time. All you have to do is :

Take a clear photo of a space monster, a space monster ship, or find a part of a space monster ship. Don't photoshop in a fake one, though, like 90 percent of other space monster chasers have done.

Write a paper and submit it to a peer reviewed journal like Science or Nature.

On an aside, I suspect I wouldn't be the only one heading to the liquor cabinet were space monsters to invade. I would also be filling buckets with water, as Mel Gibson has discovered that space monsters can't stand water.

Ever yours in skepticism,
mysterio

[Quix]

No. I don’t quite think so.

From my perspective . . .

it APPEARS EMPHATICALLY that you lean sooooooooo far away from a TYPE I ERROR that you VIRTUALLY INSURE a TYPE II ERROR.

That’s not scientific nor logical, to me.

Even as a shrink, I have a hard time explaining that behavior. However, I remain quite curious about it.

I don’t think water is a problem but supposedly ammonia is quite deadly to greys.

Yeah, I think the Biblical prediction of ‘men’s hearts failing them for fear’ will, in part, eventually have something to do with such phenomena/events.

I don’t think much of naysayers and peer reviewed journals. The peer reviewed high quality truly scientific agricultural journal reviewing a crop circle crop analysis couple of articles or 3 was

VERY IRRATIONALLY dissed hereon. VERY IRRATIONALLY. Shocked even naysayer hardened moi. I was aghast at the ignorance and utterly clueless diatribes in response. They would NOT DEAL WITH the evidence. Pure irrational biased hostility beginning to end.

Anyway—off to church.

Blessings,