">Rove you magnificent bastard!
Posted on 10/23/2008 9:59:45 AM PDT by BGHater
">LOL
Protest all you like, Sybil. Changes nothing.
Man, you are MEAN SPIRITED.
I rest my case.
Oh, Bill, isn't this exciting! My nodes are tingling!!
(my favorite thread of all times)
I see. So challenging somebody to put their money where their mouth is, and telling them they’re blowing smoke out their patoot otherwise, is “mean spirited” on the same level as calling somebody “Sybil” and accusing them of the same dishonor as DUers. I get it. *sigh* Clearly YOU MISS IT.
The burden of proof is on those who make extraordinary claims.
I know. I know.
But THEY are SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO CONVINCED
of their own brilliance and knowledge!
Almost . . . almost begs for a tweaky response! LOL.
Just a kind of tweaky handle, trademark, I think.
Soeething distinguishing that one can fantasize results in one sounding more intellectual and erudite . . . compared to the ignorant serfs that believe such stuff . . . LOL.
Trouble is . . . those with an experience need never be at the mercy of those with only an argument and intellectual fantasies and tweaky labels.
What you ask of me is far more mind-stretching — to wit, that all these witnesses on tape, in writing, in books, on news programs, from all walks of life — pilots, air traffic controllers, astronauts, policemen, military officers, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc . — that ALL of them are either lying or delusional — all based on your one experience with sleep paralysis. *sigh* Talk about far-fetched.
INDEED.
Isn’t it amazing . . .
how the clueless, ignorant, willfully blind folks
do mental gymnastic back flips about speed of ight and shock waves etc.
further proving they haven’t read much of the literature and/or aren’t trusting the enginners and scientists much wiser and far more experienced in the phenomena than they are.
Should be very interesting to hear the shockwave from their jaws hitting the concrete in the not too distant future.
It’s like Stanton Friedman says . . .
They don’t do their homework.
They don’t visit the archives.
They don’t read even 20% of the best reports.
They have no experiences.
They are arrogant, pontificating airheads thoroughly ignorant of solid info about the topic.
1. They’ve earned every letter, syllable, word, phrase thousands of times over . . . ‘tis mere reaping what they’ve sown so liberally.
2. It’s, on occasion, perversely recreational fun.
Your persistent pontifications, attitude and compulsive BLIND ADDICTION, WORSHIP
OF TYPE II ERROR risks . . .
convinces me Finny is largely to totally correct.
The RUBBER DICTIONARY STRIKES AGAIN! LOL
IGNORANT QUESTIONS = OBVIOUS QUESTIONS.
WHO’D A THUNK!
Very well and accurately put, imho.
I wonder why space monsters mostly abduct schizophrenics? Maybe they are trying to cure that disorder.
So, are you saying that you accepted the peer reviewed scientific agronomy articles asserting the several differences between genuine OTHER WORLDLY crop circle damaged plants vs plants not on such crop circles and vs plants in crop circles hoaxed???
IIRC, you were still on the side of gross willfully ignorant skepticism on that thread, too.
I’m not in the least convinced that peer reviewed articles in Scientific American or any other profesional jouranl would influence the granite between the ears on this topic in the slightest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.