Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is 40 Really the New 20? What Sex and The City Doesn't Say (Spoilers)
Exile Street blog ^ | June 3, 2008 | B. Morrissey

Posted on 06/03/2008 7:22:19 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: sinanju

Jerry and George had some really hot girlfriends on Seinfeld too. Every episode it was someone new.


21 posted on 06/03/2008 10:24:30 AM PDT by weegee (Obama 2008 motto; Get on the bus, or prepare to be thrown under it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Let me translate: It is a CHICK flick!!!!!! Now move along...

So it is Lifetime pron?

22 posted on 06/03/2008 10:29:05 AM PDT by weegee (Obama 2008 motto; Get on the bus, or prepare to be thrown under it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: contemplator

It is addressing trends. When young upwardly mobile women forgo marriage for recreational sex and career and then “settle down” after their biological clock has ceased to be fertile (needing medical treatments that give us a disproportionate number of twins and triplets) it changes the culture. They also will be about a generation older than the mothers of the other kids at their child’s school (not everyone is a sexually liberated yuppie).

The intellectuals got so smart that they ceased to reproduce.


23 posted on 06/03/2008 10:33:10 AM PDT by weegee (Obama 2008 motto; Get on the bus, or prepare to be thrown under it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

If they are trying to have a child there is a world of difference between twenty and forty. They may get REALLY BAD NEWS if they wait until forty to try conceiving.


24 posted on 06/03/2008 10:42:02 AM PDT by MSF BU (++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
It is really getting annoying that folks like you, who have clearly never even seen the show think they know what it is about. The show is about deep enduring friendship between four women, with their sex and love lives as a backdrop. From those in the know:

Bushnell said that she based her New York Observer column, “Sex and the City,” on her relationships with her girlfriends. The characters in the column and on the show are based on Bushnell and her friends in real life.

Bushnell speaks on sex, city and shoes

Michael Patrick King, Executive Producer:"People thought, oh it's just about sex or it's just about fashion. And then slowly over the years people start to see it's really about love ... and relationships ... and sex ... and basically the battlefield of trying to be in love—whether it be with another person or with yourself."

Wiki Entry

25 posted on 06/03/2008 10:42:58 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Jerry and George had some really hot girlfriends on Seinfeld too. Every episode it was someone new.

Does that make Jerry and George sluts?

26 posted on 06/03/2008 10:47:00 AM PDT by JillValentine (Being a feminist is all about being a victim. Being an armed woman is all about not being a victim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

I’m 31, female, single, and don’t need Sex and the City’s permission to make it “okay.”


27 posted on 06/03/2008 10:50:11 AM PDT by JillValentine (Being a feminist is all about being a victim. Being an armed woman is all about not being a victim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Jerry or Elaine, usually, and sometimes George or Kramer would find the love of their lives early in an episode. Then they would find some little imperfection: “Man hands,” retrograde attitude to abortion, funny-sounding laugh, and so on, and dump them by the end of the show.

This was common as well on SATC. The other party had to be perfect from the get-go. Remember when Charlotte almost married a guy, but dumped him because she couldn’t stand his taste in wedding china?

I recall a 2000 TIME article about empowered thirtysomething women refusing to “settle.” If only we could stay 34 forever... Where are they now? Do you suppose?


28 posted on 06/03/2008 10:59:05 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

In the mid-nineties, when Bushnell’s book first came out, reviewers pointed out that—like a late-model Woody Allen movie—she didn’t exactly run with an everyday New Yorker crowd.


29 posted on 06/03/2008 11:04:38 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: weegee

It’s an almost soviet-style indoctrination. The SATC/Cosmo-girl/Rom-com life plan. You go all-out on the glamorous career and boffo sex life from 18 to 33, then McDreamy will stumble into your life and sweep you off your feet and you will live happily ever after.

If not? Well, stock up on the kitty litter, I guess...


30 posted on 06/03/2008 11:09:45 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter; All

I have seen a bit of the show. Every time I turn to it, they are in bed with some guy.

Don’t tell me the show is “deep” because it involves themes other than getting laid.

When you turn to the show and that is what you see 90 percent of the time, that is the show.

They didn’t name it Sex and the City because it is about girlfriends.


31 posted on 06/03/2008 11:12:59 AM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Yep, it sounds deep, like, you know, too deep for us folks to unnestan! Better than Tolstoy, if not as good as Toy Story!
32 posted on 06/03/2008 11:20:39 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Are you ready to pray for Teddy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Puts me in mind of the movie "Its a Wonderful Life" when Clarence tells George of the horror that Mary has become "an old maid." We then see Donna Reed in librarian getup being scared of every man she meets.

Well, the reason Mary is in the libraarian get up is because she was a pot with only one potential lid--George. And she's not afraid of the average man because she's a spinster, she's scared because Potterville is riddled with poverty and crime.

I'm sure Capra wouldn't have had a spinster character scared of her own shadow on the streets of Bedford Falls.

33 posted on 06/03/2008 11:34:24 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sinanju
The gals on the show somehow have money to burn AND all the free time to socialize...

Trust fund kids.

34 posted on 06/03/2008 11:38:43 AM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

No. Only Charlotte came from money. Miranda and Carrie were of middle-class origins. Samantha, the only native New Yorker—while well-polished—was proudly working-class, self-made.


35 posted on 06/03/2008 11:50:43 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sinanju
No. Only Charlotte came from money. Miranda and Carrie were of middle-class origins. Samantha, the only native New Yorker—while well-polished—was proudly working-class, self-made.

You're talking about some Hollywood thing that I haven't seen and likely never will see.

I was talking about trust-fund people I have met in real life. For the most part, they are shallow, self-centered individuals who can not maintain relationships and who no one really likes.

36 posted on 06/03/2008 11:58:19 AM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

“Is 40 Really the New 20?”

God I hope not. I’m 39 and NOT looking to have more kids, mine are almost grown....2 years & counting!


37 posted on 06/03/2008 12:19:58 PM PDT by Grunthor (The GOP would be better off LOSING then electing McCain. - MNJohnnie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

Well then, I guess we’d better up the Estate tax to make sure those nasty rich people can’t spoil their offspring.


38 posted on 06/03/2008 12:24:36 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sinanju
Well then, I guess we’d better up the Estate tax to make sure those nasty rich people can’t spoil their offspring.

I didn't say anything about that. All I said is that I have met real life trust fund kids who's life attitude is not appreciably different than welfare bums, albeit with fancier cloths and cars.

Besides, the estate tax does not impact trust funds. Ask any Kennedy.

39 posted on 06/03/2008 12:37:22 PM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JillValentine
Does that make Jerry and George sluts?

Nah. Just makes them about as believable as the Tooth Fairy.

40 posted on 06/03/2008 1:35:57 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick (www.hillary-watch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson