1 posted on
05/06/2008 5:27:49 PM PDT by
Soliton
To: Soliton
Cool.
But, I wonder how long it will take for the usual suspects to call it a fraud.
2 posted on
05/06/2008 5:38:03 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Soliton
![](http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn13824/dn13824-1_471.jpg)
Looks like a duck...
4 posted on
05/06/2008 5:42:21 PM PDT by
null and void
(My brain is a sieve, and Aratosthenes is nowhere to be found. ~ Stolen from Darksheare...)
To: blam
To: Soliton
they are limited to a period from 125 to 120 million years ago too narrow a time span to show much evidence of evolution within bird lineages How much time do you need? How much do you have?
They're saying that 5 million years is too narrow to show much evidence of evolution within bird lineages -- uh, how much time do they postulate for hominid evolution? Less than 5 million I think. How's that work?
11 posted on
05/06/2008 6:12:47 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Et si omnes ego non)
To: Soliton
This is great fossil of a line of birds which had long feathers on their legs as well.
A documentary on PBS’s NOVA showed how these long leg feathers helped the bird fly versus today’s birds which do not have these features at all.
To: Soliton
What is the “rational caucus”?
16 posted on
05/06/2008 6:37:03 PM PDT by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: SunkenCiv
To: Soliton
32 posted on
05/07/2008 8:35:32 PM PDT by
VOA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson