[proxy_user]

First it’s too easy, then it’s too hard.

Personally, I don’t see why low scores are bad. Customers want to see some birdies and eagles.

[Zuben Elgenubi]

First it’s too easy, then it’s too hard. Personally, I don’t see why low scores are bad. Customers want to see some birdies and eagles.

.

Tiger says, "I'll take you up on that one, proxy_user!!!

[Publius Valerius]

Personally, I don’t see why low scores are bad.

In an ordinary tournament, I agree that they aren't bad. But in a major championship, I want to see the best golfers in the most difficult conditions. Anyone can make birdies, but I want to see someone win who plays the absolute best golf. In the US Open, that means severe penalities for those who miss the fairway. At the Masters, that means super fast greens and terribly difficult pin placements.

After all, Johnny Miller's 63 wasn't great because it was a 63--it was great because it was a 63 on Sunday at the US Open.