Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Resolute Conservative

Really-—
You’d be very surprised at the ‘non-sluts’ who not only have them but are working on full back murals.

It’s not watcha think.


20 posted on 04/02/2008 9:22:31 AM PDT by najida (On FR- Everyman is Brad Pitt, Everywoman is Aunt Bea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: najida

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. No tats for me, it is a deal killer.


22 posted on 04/02/2008 9:51:05 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: najida
You’d be very surprised at the ‘non-sluts’ who not only have them but are working on full back murals.

It’s not watcha think.

Sure it is; they're just too stupid or ignorant to realize it.

That's okay, though; God still loves them anyway.

45 posted on 04/02/2008 1:45:36 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: najida; Resolute Conservative
You’d be very surprised at the ‘non-sluts’ who not only have them but are working on full back murals.

It’s not watcha think.

Regardless of whether or not you think lower back tattoos make a woman look slutty, one would hope that most here would find the marketing of even fake lower back tattoos to LITTLE GIRLS as repulsive as the marketing of thong underwear and other sexually oriented apparel to LITTLE GIRLS. It's bad enough that young teens are constantly being sexualized in corporate marketing strategies, but the push to sensualize and sexualize children at earlier and earlier ages is truly disgusting.

54 posted on 04/02/2008 2:25:33 PM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson