Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force's stealth fighters making final flights
CNN ^ | March 11, 2008 | staff reporter

Posted on 03/11/2008 2:22:34 PM PDT by Daffynition

DAYTON, Ohio (AP) -- The world's first attack aircraft to employ stealth technology is slipping quietly into history.

The inky black, angular, radar-evading F-117, which spent 27 years in the Air Force arsenal secretly patrolling hostile skies from Serbia to Iraq, will be put in mothballs next month in Nevada.

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio, which manages the F-117 program, will have an informal, private retirement ceremony Tuesday with military leaders, base employees and representatives from Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico.

The last F-117s scheduled to fly will leave Holloman on April 21, stop in Palmdale, California, for another retirement ceremony, then arrive on April 22 at their final destination: Tonopah Test Range Airfield in Nevada, where the jet made its first flight in 1981.

The government has no plans to bring the fighter out of retirement, but could do so if necessary.

"I'm happy to hear they are putting it in a place where they could bring it back if they ever needed it," said Brig. Gen. Gregory Feest, the first person to fly an F-117 in combat, during the 1989 invasion of Panama that led to the capture of dictator Manuel Noriega.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f117; stealth; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 03/11/2008 2:22:34 PM PDT by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

bttt


2 posted on 03/11/2008 2:26:35 PM PDT by isaiah55version11_0 (For His Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Damn, I’m old. It just doesn’t seem to be possible they could be retiring the F-117.

But its also hard to imagine kids born when Clinton was President getting the driver’s licenses.


3 posted on 03/11/2008 2:27:23 PM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

I can’t believe they are being retired this soon. Must cost a fortune to keep them flying. The first time I ever saw one was driving by Holloman AFB from Alamogordo to White Sands Natl. Park. As we drove by the base one took off right over our heads. Amazing. It made our day.


4 posted on 03/11/2008 2:31:01 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

I suspect they’ll occasionally pull one or two out of retirement for special missions.


5 posted on 03/11/2008 2:33:35 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Voting CONSERVATIVE in memory of 5 children killed by illegals 2/17/08 and 2/19/ 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

IF they are in good shape, I don’t see why we retire them. If they have been maintained well they should still work.


6 posted on 03/11/2008 2:33:42 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Scared the bejesus out of the Sino Soviets and the rest of the world and proved their ability against Sadassed Insane !

Well done ......


7 posted on 03/11/2008 2:36:11 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

They work, but they’re appalling expensive to maintain, compared to the stealthy F-22s which are now coming online.


8 posted on 03/11/2008 2:38:49 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Philo-Junius

I would keep them maintained enough to be ready very quickly though. We lose a few multi-hundred million dollar F-22s out of a smaller total number, you might need them again.


9 posted on 03/11/2008 2:51:20 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Philo-Junius
Expensive to maintain, their airframes weren't designed for multi-generational use, and spare parts are starting to dry up. The F-35 has a slightly higher radar profile, should cost a quarter to build, and a tenth as much to maintain, which is why the F-35 will be the mainline fighter, and the F-22 was designed as a replacement for the stealth fighter, and the new munitions that are coming online.

Still, sorry to see it mothballed.

10 posted on 03/11/2008 3:09:54 PM PDT by kingu (Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

It’s not a fighter, it’s just a small bomber.


11 posted on 03/11/2008 3:18:00 PM PDT by PeterFinn (I am not voting for McCain. No way, no how.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

They will be replaced by the F-22 and other stealthier planes.


12 posted on 03/11/2008 3:24:48 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

I wonder if all the old test pilots were there at the retirement.These things had been flyin since about 1977 in the Have Blue program.Really cool stuff.


13 posted on 03/11/2008 4:17:05 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Wonder how far off introduction of the Aurora is?


14 posted on 03/11/2008 4:26:19 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Senator McCain, what did GWB promise you back in 2000? And you believed him? BWAHAAAAA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Some great photos for olde times sake. ;)
15 posted on 03/12/2008 2:19:25 AM PDT by Daffynition (The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

16 posted on 03/12/2008 2:22:26 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
Thanks for that. I find it somewhat amazing that it could fly in the first place...


17 posted on 03/12/2008 2:29:45 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

I’m sure ol Moammar Khadafy will be happy to see them go.


18 posted on 03/12/2008 2:31:50 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Member of the irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
Bats in the belfry!


19 posted on 03/12/2008 2:48:20 AM PDT by Daffynition (The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt; gondramB
"If we needed the door kicked in, the stealth was the one to do it." Gen. Lloyd Newton, original F-117A pilot.
20 posted on 03/12/2008 3:03:56 AM PDT by Daffynition (The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson