Posted on 01/06/2008 11:21:02 PM PST by yorkie
Barak Obama proved victorious in Iowa last week, winning the caucuses and presenting a triumphant speech in front of media and supporters alike. The mere fact that Obama won the Iowa Caucuses came as a surprise for most people who kept hearing about Hillary Clinton making a firm stand as the front runner of the Democratic Party. But the Clinton campaign sure got a crude wake-up call in Iowa.
So, how exactly does her campaign fight back as the New Hampshire Primaries approach? They lie about Obama's record on abortion rights. Keep in mind, the Clinton campaign has played dirty in the past by playing up Obama's drug experimentation when he was young, and criticizing his support for health care before the Iowa Caucuses. But now abortion rights are the name of the negative campaigning game. May seem hard to believe, but in a mailer sent out to New Hampshire residents, Clinton's campaign writes that Obama has failed to take a position on abortion bills, whereas Clinton has been an avid pro-choicer.
That mailer would have been justified if it were true. But the fact of the matter is Obama has done nothing but enrage abortion opponents by voting against bills that would require medical care for fetuses who survive attempted abortion. He even has a 100 percent rating from the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council for his support of abortion and health insurance coverage for female contraceptives. If that's not pro-choice behavior, I don't know what is.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.aol.com ...
If that's not pro-choice sick, twisted, psychopathic, murderous behavior, I don't know what is.
There - fixed it.
Thanks! Another excellent reason to fight like heck to keep these people out of the WH!
Requiring that care is given to people who survive an abortion, in pain yet alive, is some kind of far out-there policy?
So much for the bulls*** about pro-abortionists REALLY being pro-choice. They would kill babies by hand if they could.
These are people of faith. Their version of religion just happens to allow for the physical destruction of babies. Infanticide has a long tradition in socialist circles and certan Baalist religions. They are just being true toBaalzibub and their party.
Even the baby-killing liberals can’t stand her.
Duh! "Keep it in mind"?
These folks are slow; but maybe they finally heard someone yell,
"The empress has no clothes!"
Now, please pardon men while I go scrape that image outta' my mind!
What gets to me most is how they refer to unborn babies as “It”. As in “I got rid of it”. They have no soul and only care about themselves.
I’ve had to spend a lot of time with proabort folks over the years and it’s hilarious how touchy they are if you don’t use the proper labels. They are so scared of talking about the truth. If you say “baby” they roll their eyes and say “That’s an inaccurate term,” which I suppose it is on a purely technical level, so of course I applaud them for their concern with facts and exactness of meaning. I then ask them why they insist on being called “pro-choice” when they don’t call folks who are for protecting gun rights “pro-gun-choice” and on and on. Then I ask them to tell me what NAACP stands for, and watch their heads explode. :D
LOLOLOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.