I have never met Dr Baughman and do not know if he is a scientolgist. I posted this article because I think the doctor has a valid point. If he does happen to be a scientologist as you say it may cast a cloud over him but it doesn’t change the validity of what he has to say.
If he is a scientologist (who are rabidly anti-psychiatry/psychology) how can you assert that the "validity" of what he's saying, from a scientific viewpoint, isn't tainted by his cultist beliefs?