Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
Downward compatibility is a major resource drag on development, every OS you have to support is another round of regression testing and OS dependent bug fixes. Eventually you have to draw a line in the sand and say "we're not even going to try to work on that".

You just told the story of Vista vs. OS X, and why OS X is still ahead.

19 posted on 03/28/2007 10:14:29 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat

No I told the story of developing applications. How far back is software made for OSX compatible? Does Safari work on System 7? Eventually everybody has to draw that line in the sand, downward compatibility is a lot of additional labor for steadily decreasing return, this is a platform independent problem. The only real advatage open source has on this is that while the guys "in charge" of a product can set a cut off point if there are enough people in the extended community that want the new rev to support some antique OS then they can do it themselves. But even that isn't a real solution, that's a community based work around that assumes there are going to be enough skilled people that care to extend the product's functionality beyond the line originally intended.


20 posted on 03/28/2007 10:21:32 AM PDT by discostu (The fat lady laughs, gentlemen, start your trucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson