Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Space Wrangler
they obviously thought they could be profitable with offering a desktop version before getting yanked back into line by MS and backing away after making the announcement.

And your proof of this claim is? There is none that I know of. The facts are Dell already tried to offer Linux on the desktop, but pulled it due to losses.

I understand you aren't much of a Linux fan, but I can tell you from a professional point of view that it's coming.

From who, on the desktop? Look at the top PC sales vendors, none offer Linux on a "desktop", only expensive workstations or servers sold to businesses that cost a premium. The day Red Hat or Suse can charge enough for their products to kick some back to Dell to pay for their support costs is the day Dell starts offering it preinstalled. Obviously that point is nowhere near.

36 posted on 03/08/2007 8:31:29 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle

^^^^^^^^^^^^^The day Red Hat or Suse can charge enough for their products to kick some back to Dell to pay for their support costs is the day Dell starts offering it preinstalled. Obviously that point is nowhere near.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That's sort of a red herring argument. Linux doesn't require anything like the amount of upkeep that a windows machine does.

It's about on par with a mac. OS 9 or 10. They just don't need much upkeep.

The most upkeep that I do personally is my browser cache. Talk about a backbreaker.

Hey, is your spyware software up to date? :-)


40 posted on 03/08/2007 8:49:54 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (Linux, the #2 OS. Mac, the #3 OS. That's why Picasa is on Linux and not Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson