Posted on 11/22/2006 3:21:05 PM PST by Paul Ross
Edited on 11/23/2006 1:15:11 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
No material from Independent Online is permitted on Free Republic.
(Excerpt) Read more at belfasttelegraph.co.uk ...
This following observation is dead-on:
One third of each new Airbus programme is funded by repayable launch aid from the taxpayer. This, and the fact that it does not have to answer to a conventional set of shareholders...
While the loans are technically "repayable" for the record...they aren't being repaid.
I like how the article summarized:
"This veritable ocean liner of the sky will go down in history like the Concorde." Perhaps not the best of analogies, but you know what he was trying to say.
Let's hope not!
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the Clinton Presidential Library.
There was a fascinating documentary on HBO or PBS a few years ago, showing how they schlep the huge subassemblies around Europe. The river barge just managed to make it under an ancient stone bridge. No wonder they can't get the thing together!
I think Boeing was actually rather generous in its estimates...LOL!
But that continues to look like an optimistic assumption, for everything appears to be conspiring against the A380, not least the value of the dollar, the currency in which all commercial aircraft are sold. When Airbus launched the programme six years ago, it needed to sell 300 aircraft to cover its costs. Because of the way the dollar has weakened, Airbus now needs to sell 420 planes. The order book stands at 149.
And this little "problem", i.e., the weakening dollar...likely will get a whole lot worse as presaged by the continuing, non-stop increase in the trade imbalance. And who knows what the impact of bugging out of Iraq will be...
The American mail company FedEx has become the first launch customer to cancel its order for 10 freighter versions of the aircraft, and at least one passenger airline has indicated it could follow suit. If the cancellations turn from a trickle to a flood, then the consequences would be catastrophic.
T I M B E R ! Look Out Below!!!!
Just my guess that Airbus is going under. The plane is late, overweight, fuel inefficient, too big, there aren't enough orders, and Boeing has been cleaning their clock.
<< .... "Europe's answer" to Boeing and, until recently, a shiningly successful example of ...... the many billions of pounds sunk into this grand (Wank) .... >>
By the corrupt little men who squander the confiscated wealth of the collectivized citizens of Britain, France, Germany and Spain -- and of several of the other squalidly socialistic satellite states of the Euro-peons' Neo-Soviet.
Any wonder why unfair development no-risk "loans" are such a contentious issue? If you owned a company, wouldn't you like to get a hold of a sub-market interest rate long term loan which you don't have to pay back until you begin to rake in profits from that product? If you never profit from it, then you never have to pay it back. And, don't forget, they haven't even decided how to do...or when... the accounting to determine when you start to make a profit from that product! You don't suppose there's any temptation to cook the books?
They're both building aircraft in the 100 passenger range now and, I'd guess, are just waiting to see what happens with the European elephant before making the move into wide-bodies.
Boeing should be so lucky as to have a monopoly. The Chicoms and the Russkies aren't out of the game either.
Boeing is a monopoly -- thanks to the Clinton Administration's misquided attempt to "rationalize" the aerospace industry.
Airbus is emerging as the opposite pole that markets will always try to create as a counterweight to a monopoly.
The article is insightful. The A380 is a remarkable technical achievement, as remarkable as the 747 and Concorde were in their days. (The 747 was also initially called a market failure by cynical newsmen). But Airbus Industrie is, in the final analysis, a political beast, which imposes terrible inefficiencies. (The example of the internationally perambulating wing sections is just one of hundreds of possible Airbus screwup stories).
Another example of political pressure on the struggling company is the British demand that work on Airbus projects remain in Britain... after the British stake in EADS was sold off. If Daimler Chrysler could find a buyer for their stake on the same terms that BAe got for theirs, they'd be gone, now, too, and Airbus would be in fact what it has always been in perception, a French government enterprise.
While Airbus has a few brickbats coming, Boeing is hardly a knight in shining armour. The US also twists international arms for Boeing... which Boeing repaid by bribing an Air Force official and screwing up tanker procurement for decades. (After that round of Boeing execs departed to retirment and/or jail, the next round included a guy who made everyone in the company sign an "ethics" pledge while he named some floozie he was banging a corporate VP. He's gone, but I believe his Monica remains).
Basically, both of these two corporate giants is too cozy with, and too dependent on, government.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
I saw some documentary on how all this stuff had to move to get assembled in France...Ill-concieved foolish and unnecessary choke points... definitely not a good choice for large scale volume of transportation movements should the plane ever go into full production... terrorists could stop that production real easy...I saw the folly in the whole deal right then.
If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.
LOL!
Airbus only repays if there's enough profit from the plane, which means that Airbus has no incentive to actually make a profit.
The Concorde may not have been a commercial success but it was a beautiful plane and a technological marvel. If it weren't for the envirowhackos, it might have had a chance.
Is that an A380 fuselage with Santa head gear?
Or the tail section with Santa pants? :)
Ha! The irony...
On November 14, the French-American Chamber of Commerce (FACC) honored Fred Smith as "Person of the Year" at an evening gala event in New York. The honor recognized the contribution Mr. Smith and FedEx have made and continue to make to the economic relationship between France and the U.S. through the leadership and international strategy of FedEx. Mr. Smith was the first American to receive the honor in seven years and only the ninth American to receive the honor in its 23-year history.
"Fred Smith, through his vision of the world, has created a global enterprise that has transformed the logistics and transportation industry and accelerated economic activity in dozens of countries," said Serge Bellanger, president of the FACC....
http://www.investinfrance.org/NorthAmerica/Newsroom/News/?p=news&id=2006-11-15&l=en
About a year & a half ago, i bet someone the A380 would be way behing schedule. This was about 3 months before the failed wing test, IIRC.
I wish I could remeber who, and on what thread. They owe me cash! (i think it was a quarter).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.