Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Douglas, Zeta-Jones privacy case could set legal precedent
AFP ^ | 11/22/06

Posted on 11/22/2006 6:26:36 AM PST by presidio9

A claim for intrusion of privacy by Hollywood super-couple Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones went to Britain's House of Lords, in a case which could set a landmark precedent.

Just a few days after their sixth wedding anniversary, lawyers for the star pair joined forces with celebrity weekly OK! -- which bought the rights to cover their nuptials -- against rival star magazine Hello!.

Hello! secretly took pictures of their New York wedding in November 2000, despite the deal under which OK! had paid one million dollars for exclusive pictures of the Plaza Hotel ceremony.

Media lawyers say that if OK! wins by successfully arguing there was a right of confidentiality, then a new law protecting the image of person would be created in Britain.

Zeta Jones told the 2003 High Court hearing she felt "devastated, shocked and appalled" when she realised unauthorised photographers had gatecrashed her high-security wedding.

The 14,600-pound (21,600-euro, 27,700-dollar) damages awarded to Douglas and his wife by the High Court for the distress and inconvenience the Hello! coverage caused them was not challenged at the Court of Appeal.

Hello! will argue during the five-day hearing that any confidentiality ceased after OK! published the photographs.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: catherinezetajones

1 posted on 11/22/2006 6:26:37 AM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

WHO! CARES!


2 posted on 11/22/2006 6:27:28 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

It's so nice to see a young woman out with her father...


3 posted on 11/22/2006 6:29:37 AM PST by LongElegantLegs (...a urethral syringe used to treat syphilis with mercury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

They care because the second magazine didn't give them any money.


4 posted on 11/22/2006 6:30:29 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

5 posted on 11/22/2006 6:31:24 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance (<h2>SAY NO TO RUDY! I know how to spell, I just type like s#it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

bookmark


6 posted on 11/22/2006 6:31:26 AM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

7 posted on 11/22/2006 6:32:53 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance (<h2>SAY NO TO RUDY! I know how to spell, I just type like s#it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

>>Media lawyers say that if OK! wins by successfully arguing there was a right of confidentiality, then a new law protecting the image of person would be created in Britain. <<

So their courts create laws as well? Interesting.


8 posted on 11/22/2006 6:34:16 AM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

9 posted on 11/22/2006 6:34:24 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance (<h2>SAY NO TO RUDY! I know how to spell, I just type like s#it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

10 posted on 11/22/2006 6:36:04 AM PST by Red Badger (New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Are we now obliged to post pictures of Maureen Dowd?


11 posted on 11/22/2006 6:36:45 AM PST by atomicpossum (Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

On a CZJ thread do we have to post pics of Mo Dowd?

I hope not.


12 posted on 11/22/2006 6:36:51 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Have you thanked the rich person who subsidized your share of taxation today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Isn't that how the rule goes? ;-)

13 posted on 11/22/2006 6:37:05 AM PST by mwyounce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

Beat me by 6 seconds.

Great minds think alike.


14 posted on 11/22/2006 6:37:51 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Have you thanked the rich person who subsidized your share of taxation today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Skip the text, but view the pics. That's the beauty of CZJ threads.


15 posted on 11/22/2006 6:37:52 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance (<h2>SAY NO TO RUDY! I know how to spell, I just type like s#it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Exactly! Who are they anyway?


16 posted on 11/22/2006 6:39:43 AM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mwyounce

WHOA. Isn't that Dan Rather behind the bar?


17 posted on 11/22/2006 6:43:51 AM PST by small voice in the wilderness (The worst case scenario is even worse than I imagined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LongElegantLegs
She's 37, he's 62, by the Victorian guideline for perfect marriage age (bride half the groom's age, plus 7), she's just the right age for him

(I just find it amusing when women get incensed at the sight of an older man with a much younger woman)

18 posted on 11/22/2006 7:33:29 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the arrogance to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

Yes...Yes, I'm incensed. That's it. 0.0


19 posted on 11/22/2006 8:42:55 AM PST by LongElegantLegs (...a urethral syringe used to treat syphilis with mercury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson