Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sun releases Java under GPL licence
The Inquirer ^ | November 13, 2006 | Fernando Cassia

Posted on 11/13/2006 12:57:27 AM PST by HAL9000

Excerpt -

SUN MICROSYSTEMS will announce today that its Java language, contrary to the prediction of many pundits, will be offered as pure "Free Software" -as Richard Stallman would say "free as in freedom"- under a GPL version two licence.

Ponytailed CEO Jonathan Schwartz will announce the ground-breaking move in a webcast to be held later at 9:30am Pacific Time. Both Java SE -used on desktops - and Java ME - used on mobile phones and PDAs- will be included. The server-side Java, or Java EE will be available both under the GPL version two licence and the same Common Development and Distribution Licence (CDDL) that Sun has used until now.

~ snip ~


(Excerpt) Read more at theinquirer.net ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: freeasinspeech; gpl; java; opensource; servers; sun; sunmicrosystems

1 posted on 11/13/2006 12:57:29 AM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Pretty exciting!

Sadly, it's probably too little too late.

2 posted on 11/13/2006 2:51:22 AM PST by newzjunkey (I blame Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Well we already knew Richard Stallman (www.stallman.org) was a moonbat leftist, now it appears the new "ponytailed CEO" of Sun Swartz may be too. I would have stuck solely with the CDDL license, as they did with Open Solaris, if I was going to allow others to make free copies and run with them in the first place. This wasn't even necessary in my opinion, the source code of Java was already available, this was just capitulating to Stallman's "community", something that could now result in legal Chinese versions of Java, etc. My belief is America will one day regret how we gave control of these industry satndards away to the rest of the world for less than a nickel, simply because they were begging for them.


3 posted on 11/13/2006 5:31:12 AM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3; ShadowAce; MikefromOhio

Big Daddy, if you are alive....GPL is communism! Squawk! Squawk! Ping!


4 posted on 11/13/2006 8:09:10 AM PST by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...

5 posted on 11/13/2006 8:21:12 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

I do not do any webpage/website programming. Do I need to install Java on my computer if I just want to read webpages that use Java? Can anyone answer?


6 posted on 11/13/2006 9:04:09 AM PST by CedarDave ("O Lord make my enemies ridiculous." ~ Voltaire. "Will John Kerry do?" - Lord (courtesy catpuppy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

The article misses a point about Novell's mono project. It was in the past always aiming at the moving and patent-protected target that is .NET, but with the new MS/Novell cooperation it's possible that mono will now be kept even with Microsoft's own .NET releases.


7 posted on 11/13/2006 9:08:18 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
In order to run Java programs, you need a Java interpreter. Chances are you already have one.

Go Here and try to load one of the applets. If you can, then you have a Java interpreter. If not, then you likely do not.

 (The above linked site is run by Sun Microsystems)

AmP

8 posted on 11/13/2006 9:09:54 AM PST by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place. (http://www.zprc.org/))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
I do not do any webpage/website programming. Do I need to install Java on my computer if I just want to read webpages that use Java? Can anyone answer?

If the pages actually use Java, then you will need to install a java runtime environment (JRE) -- you don't need the entire Java development kit (JDK).

However, don't confuse "Java" with the misnomer "Javascript", which is just a scripting language built into the browser itself, and needs no additional downloads.

9 posted on 11/13/2006 9:10:57 AM PST by kevkrom (John F'n Kerry's 'apology': "I'm sorry you were too stupid to realize I wasn't calling you stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Do I need to install Java on my computer if I just want to read webpages that use Java?

You only need to install the Java runtime.

10 posted on 11/13/2006 9:10:59 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Saw this in the WSJ today - don't know what the practical implications of this are however - Java is already a standard and easily available on all platforms - what does this mean in practical terms?


11 posted on 11/13/2006 9:45:57 AM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Well, there is this:

Sun's Historic Java Announcement

12 posted on 11/13/2006 10:14:33 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
From the link above:

Why did they choose GPL? Because developers love it and understand it and are comfortable with it.

*************************************************

Importance may be more relevant to developers than users....who get to use the stuff developers develop.....

13 posted on 11/13/2006 10:17:55 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Saw this in the WSJ today - don't know what the practical implications of this are however - Java is already a standard and easily available on all platforms - what does this mean in practical terms?

If I had to guess? Sun thinks Java is a mature enough technology that they no longer want to deal with being in charge of enforcing standardization.

14 posted on 11/13/2006 10:18:05 AM PST by kevkrom (John F'n Kerry's 'apology': "I'm sorry you were too stupid to realize I wasn't calling you stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat; kevkrom; zeugma

Thank you much. I have an two separate old versions of RTE on the computer which I just deleted. Going to reboot and install the newest one.


15 posted on 11/13/2006 10:20:19 AM PST by CedarDave ("O Lord make my enemies ridiculous." ~ Voltaire. "Will John Kerry do?" - Lord (courtesy catpuppy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom; Ernest_at_the_Beach

I guess it's all part of the long term chess match - maybe too early to tell if significant for us mere mortals or not. I do agree that Sun benefits by getting out from under the Java burden but then again that doesn't change my life any. I guess one point I was making was that Java wasn't exactly withering on the vine before this announcement - or maybe it was and we just didn't know it? Maybe we'll see more cool java apps in the future? Certainly lots of cool buzzwords to toss around - Sun, Java, GPL, OSS etc. etc. :)


16 posted on 11/13/2006 10:23:04 AM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Sun releases java. Are we cooked??

Where's algored when you need him?

I never drink java after noon!

17 posted on 11/13/2006 10:26:13 AM PST by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten; HAL9000; CedarDave; kevkrom
Just came across this:

IBM cool to Sun's open-source Java plan

***********************AN EXCERPT ***********************88

IBM on Monday urged Sun Microsystems to participate in existing open-source Java projects at the Apache Foundation rather than start new ones.

Java creator Sun on Monday announced that it is releasing its Java desktop and mobile software under the General Public License (GPL) version 2.

The code will be implementations of standards called Java Platform Standard Edition (Java SE) and Java Platform Mobile Edition (Java ME). The code to Sun's Java server is available through the GPL now as well.

After years of internal debates and public calls from IBM to make Java open source, you would think that IBM would be overjoyed at the news.

Not so.

IBM on Monday issued a statement attributed to Rod Smith, vice president of emerging Internet technologies in the IBM Software Group, who penned the open letter in 2004 requesting Sun to make Java open source.

Smith said that IBM supports all open-source licenses approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI). But he noted that there are already two projects around open-source Java.

There is Harmony, a project in the incubator phase at Apache to build an open-source edition of Java SE. IBM joined the Harmony project shortly after it was launched in 2005.

Meanwhile, Motorola two weeks ago said that it will contribute code to start a Java ME project at Apache .

"In light of the Apache projects, we have discussed with Sun our strong belief that Sun should contribute their Java technologies to Apache rather than starting another open-source Java project, or at least make their contributions available under an 'Apache friendly' license to ensure the open-source Java community isn't fragmented and disenfranchised, instead Sun would be bringing the same benefits of OS (open-source) Java to this significant and growing open-source community," the statement said.

Sun chose the General Public License, rather than the Apache License, in part to ensure that there is compatibility with Linux, which is under the GPL, according to the company.

18 posted on 11/13/2006 10:30:14 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

IBM is rather upset their investment in Harmony, devised to put pressure on Sun, will now probably end up going down the drain. Not to mention the forthcoming pressure on IBM to open source EVERYTHING, as Sun now seems intent on doing. End result, *nix/Java further fragments/forks, again leaving M$ as the only company offering a solid roadmap for their technology tree.


19 posted on 11/13/2006 4:43:13 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson