Skip to comments.
Republicans lost because...oh shut up!
Vanity ^
| 11/11/2006
| Montag
Posted on 11/11/2006 5:29:00 PM PST by montag813
Is anyone else sick and tired of the endless idiotic pieces about "Why the Republicans Lost", "How Conservative Lost Their Way"...blah blah blah. Where were all these geniuses BEFORE the election?
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: election; gop; overkill; republicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
11/11/2006 5:29:01 PM PST
by
montag813
To: montag813
I am. I have not been on this site very much since the election because it seems like a dem site. I refuse to read that junk. If I wanted it, I would turn on the TV or radio.
2
posted on
11/11/2006 5:30:12 PM PST
by
MamaB
(mom to an Angel)
To: montag813
Yes.
Kinda tired of all the vanities too. ;^)
3
posted on
11/11/2006 5:30:45 PM PST
by
AtomicBuffaloWings
(Still not hot enough, A few of my taste buds are still alive.)
To: AtomicBuffaloWings
4
posted on
11/11/2006 5:31:04 PM PST
by
onyx
(I'm now a minority and victim of the democrats, but with full and free entitlements!)
To: montag813
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Iraq was not Viet Nam until Bush fired Rumsfeld. We conservatives knew that our congress critters were NOT fulfilling their promises of streamlined , less intrusive government. We calculated that Joe six-pack swing voter accepted that betrayal of public trust in the same way we did...better the devil you know...when the decision comes down on partial birth abortion, we will know if we have accomplished ANYTHING in the last six years.
5
posted on
11/11/2006 5:38:02 PM PST
by
Dutchgirl
([S]tupidity knows no ideology." ---John Fund)
To: montag813
I agree - it's time to engage the democrat enemy and their terrorist allies. Let's hunt some rat!!
To: Chi-townChief
What I would like to see is that conservatives start studying the ballots. Tell them that regardless of the outcome they won but many voters have concerns so we are going to look at the system. If any fraud uncovered though , charges will be filed.
7
posted on
11/11/2006 5:45:56 PM PST
by
CindyDawg
To: montag813
It is tiring BUT, the damage that's been done to the country cannot be forgotten as we all have to suffer for it now. It's taken almost 6 years for President Bush to try and repair the damage done from 8 years of clinton, and he's still not finished, and now we'll have two more years of the RATS in control to undo all the good GWB was able to do, and whatever else they can squeeze in. Since there seems to be so many short memories among the citizens of the U.S. today, the results of this election must be repeated often so it isn't forgotten in 2008.
8
posted on
11/11/2006 5:48:23 PM PST
by
AmeriBrit
(Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
To: Dutchgirl
Iraq was not Viet Nam until Bush fired Rumsfeld. It would have been more like Vietnam if he would have fired him BEFORE the election for political gain..
To: Dutchgirl
Iraq was not Viet Nam until Bush fired Rumsfeld.
By saying the above you are calling President Bush a liar. The President and Donald Rumsfeld have both been on TV stating he resigned. Perhaps you've forgotten conveniently that he'd wanted to retire previously but the President was able to talk him out of it. If it was the intention to fire him don't you think it would have been to the Presidents advantage to have done it before the election?
10
posted on
11/11/2006 5:56:55 PM PST
by
AmeriBrit
(Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
To: montag813
Republicans lost because...oh shut up!
11
posted on
11/11/2006 5:57:25 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: montag813
12
posted on
11/11/2006 5:58:08 PM PST
by
gate2wire
(Please Lord, look after 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
To: AmeriBrit
By saying the above you are calling President Bush a liar. He pretty much got caught lying in the press conference just the other day.
13
posted on
11/11/2006 5:58:49 PM PST
by
Sloth
(The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
To: AmeriBrit
14
posted on
11/11/2006 6:01:37 PM PST
by
ladyinred
(RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
To: Sloth
15
posted on
11/11/2006 6:10:03 PM PST
by
AmeriBrit
(Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
To: Echo Talon
The Dems want to compare Iraq to Vietnam... they want to paint the war as a "quagmire"... now Newt and others want to blame President Bush because it gives them legs and he's a lame duck anyway... a la Johnson.
Iraq is not Vietnam, the bias reporting on the war is what gives us this impression. It's time to focus on the real enemy - the terrorists and their allies on the Left.
To: PatrickF4
The Dems want to compare Iraq to Vietnam... they want to paint the war as a "quagmire"... now Newt and others want to blame President Bush because it gives them legs and he's a lame duck anyway... a la Johnson. This is part of the reason why i don't like Newt, he was also advancing the theory that (someone in Washington said NOT to strike Osama) when we saw the predator video. Even After Newt was told that the Predator wasn't armed he was still advancing the lies.. Why was he doing this?(I believe it was to make himself look better somehow.) I must have some sort of faith and trust in someone if I'm going to vote for them for POTUS and I don't have must trust in him.
To: AmeriBrit
Link
here Up until this point I counted on Bush to be a man of his word. I think that Rumsfeld has been brilliant in this efforts, In three years in Iraq, we have lost fewer men than in one day at Normandy or Iwo Jima...but when Rumsfeld's accomplishments are thrown into the dust of partianship, I can already see the refusal of congress to authorise needed expenditures.
I live down the street from a lib nut who keeps a daily tally of men lost in Iraq. I have fought the good fight, the fight of morale, daily, but Bush does not look like a commander in chief these days. He looks like a partisan hack. It's all about HIM. It's all about the party. Bush is feeling "wounded." Screw him. Men have lost limbs, wives have lost husbands, fighting for a cause that is bigger than any one person.
Bush needs a little "just for men" to get rid of the gray, he needs to sharpen up his veto pen and be VERY vocal about it. Unless the dems have a 2/3 majority, they have nothing, as long as Bush is resolute.
18
posted on
11/11/2006 6:39:22 PM PST
by
Dutchgirl
([S]tupidity knows no ideology." ---John Fund)
To: montag813
Where were all these geniuses BEFORE the election?Around here, they were being shouted down and barf alerted as closet liberal defeatists for the past year or more. This backlash didn't sneak up on anyone who was willing to see it.
19
posted on
11/11/2006 6:40:52 PM PST
by
CGTRWK
To: montag813
No. While painful, it's necessary to analyze why we lost in order to avoid simmilar defeats in the future.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson