Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Corsi files FOIA request to expose plans for 'North American union'
World Net Daily ^ | June 20th, 2006 | World Net daily

Posted on 06/20/2006 12:32:10 AM PDT by Trupolitik

Author Jerome Corsi filed a Freedom of Information Act request yesterday asking for full disclosure of the activities of an office implementing a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that apparently could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress.

Corsi specifically has requested the partnership's membership lists, constitutive documents, meeting minutes, meeting agendas and meeting schedules as well as all findings, reports, presentations or memoranda.

He also wants all comments to representatives of the "Prosperity Working Groups" or other working groups, committees or task forces associated with the partnership along with internal and external interagency or intra-agency memoranda of understanding, letters of intent, agreements, initiatives and budgeting documents.

The purpose of the FOIA, he said, is to get the "full facts exposed in the light of day, available for the American people and for Congress to examine and decide."

Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., is demanding the Bush administration fully disclose the activities of the SPP office.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 4kooks; aliens; apocalypse; blackhelicopters; canada; cfr; corporate; corporation; corsi; corsiisnuts; cuespookymusic; doooooooooomed; eu; mexico; nafta; newworldorder; sovereignty; spp; superstate; tancredo; theboogeyman; theskyisfalling; tinfoil; unitedstates; w; weredoomed; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-97 next last
It is crunch time for America’s conservatives. Will we back the actions of our Republican President, or will we stand on our principles? Our collective answer could affect the state of the union forever.

Fortunately, we still have committed conservatives like Jerome Corsi of the Swift Boat Veterans and Representative Tom Tancredo remaining vigilant. We must eventually choose: Commerce or Sovereignty?

In the past, many have suggested the mere notion of a North American Union was a conspiracy. However, the Council on Foreign Relations has made their intent clear.

http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf

Furthermore, the Bush Administration has moved this plan from theory to reality through the creation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. http://www.spp.gov/

I urge you to write your Senator and your Representative. These fine patriots cannot win this issue alone.

http://www.house.gov/

http://www.senate.gov/general/contac...nators_cfm.cfm

1 posted on 06/20/2006 12:32:15 AM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

Aaaaah!!

The Black Helicopters!!!

MAKE THEM GO AWAY!!!!


2 posted on 06/20/2006 12:37:29 AM PDT by Tarantulas ( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

...yawn...

Break out the tin-foil.

3 posted on 06/20/2006 12:37:58 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

I suppose you think that you appear intelligent by suggesting that Rep Tancredo and other concerned citizens are looking into the SPP.

Actually, because you are obviously unwilling to look at the research, you look more like liberals than anything.

Fortunately for us, most conservatives arent like you guys.


4 posted on 06/20/2006 12:48:29 AM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

Read the documents. Its not a conspiracy. Its Policy.


5 posted on 06/20/2006 12:49:15 AM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik
"Fortunately for us, most conservatives arent like you guys."

Most conservatives are exactly like me, voting for President Bush rather than Senator Kerry or journalist Corsi or Congressman Tancredo (a good man).

You are the fringe. Your guy doesn't get elected nationally. Running around shouting that you've just seen Bigfoot isn't going to win any national elections for you.

6 posted on 06/20/2006 12:52:45 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

Who do you think is behind this?


7 posted on 06/20/2006 12:55:40 AM PDT by Pro-Bush (A nation without borders is not a nation." president Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush

I bet critics of the SPP from the anti-American factions in Canada and Mexico think this is an attempt by the U.S. to increase our influence and spread our wretched freedoms, civil rights, and cultural imperialism to their sacred shores.

And they'd probably be closer to the truth as to what will happen than the people who think the U.S. will succumb under influence from either Mexico for Canada.


8 posted on 06/20/2006 1:00:02 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Actually, almost every conservative I have talked to supports Corsi's and Tancredo's effort to bring this issue to light.

Being conservative does not mean that we must support President Bush on every issue. (ie UAE/Dubai port deal and Illegal Immigration).

I hope you take the time and effort to read the documents before you pass judgment. I seriously doubt Rep. Tancredo or Jerome Corsi would be doing this because of some black helicopter theory. They are the finest patriots, and you really should think twice before you dismiss them.


9 posted on 06/20/2006 1:02:40 AM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

If the international regulatory body makes rules on transportation, health, security, borders, etc instead of our elected congress (which is the case since the SPP is solely an executive branch project with no congressional oversight), then the American voter will lose our ability to control the destiny.

We Conservatives are for smaller, more responsive and accountable government, not international entanglements and superstate bureaucracies, arent we?


10 posted on 06/20/2006 1:06:22 AM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

11 posted on 06/20/2006 1:26:44 AM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

I'm going to go with the "wait and see" crowd.

The SPP is a "concern", but as of yet it hasn't proven itself to be a "danger". And it may actually be beneficial. Only way to find out is to see what they come up with.


12 posted on 06/20/2006 1:27:40 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Southack

I'm not interested in just "winning national elections", my interest runs to protecting my grandsons future. I am tired of the "trust me, I'm a republican" crap, I want to know what is planned, no matter who is planning it. The worst damned shaftings I've had in my life were from a wife of 26 years, who I trusted, and a lifetime friend and business partner, who tried to take everything my ex wife didn't. Why should I trust someone just because they are "Republican", or claim to be? They are just as capable of shafting me as any democrat.


13 posted on 06/20/2006 1:36:24 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (LET ME DIE ON MY FEET, IN MY SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush

The G8


14 posted on 06/20/2006 3:09:23 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (No guns, No freedom. Any questions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Not every issue can be analyzed in terms of presidential votes. This is one of them.

Namely because the two choices we are offered are united in the globalist outcome. Party hacks like you really don't have much to say that's substantive on threads like this. You just make yourself look like an denial crazed manipulator.


15 posted on 06/20/2006 3:16:09 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie!'... till you can find a rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

Corsi and the other wackjobs have twisted this whole concept into something it is not.

We make agreements with other countries all the time, but that doesn't mean that we're becoming a single nation. Geez, if that were true, we'd all be one country because of the agreements regarding liability for luggage on airplanes.

I'm sick of reading this hysteria at this forum. It's embarrassing.


16 posted on 06/20/2006 3:23:31 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Then by all means, post something that justifies this crap with the Constitution. I would like to read why this isn't a blow to our sovereignty.


17 posted on 06/20/2006 3:25:48 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie!'... till you can find a rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Sorry, but the burden is on you. You're the one screaming bloody murder.

You show us where we've surrendered sovereignty. You can't because we haven't.


18 posted on 06/20/2006 3:28:22 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Seems to me that's why Corsi have files a FOIA request, which is the point of this article that you called an embarrassment.


19 posted on 06/20/2006 3:33:26 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie!'... till you can find a rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Oh, so he has no evidence, and that's reason enough to go hysterical.


20 posted on 06/20/2006 4:00:33 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000; Trupolitik; Southack; Dog Gone; ovrtaxt; Pro-Bush; SWAMPSNIPER
"I'm going to go with the "wait and see" crowd. The SPP is a "concern", but as of yet it hasn't proven itself to be a "danger". And it may actually be beneficial. Only way to find out is to see what they come up with."

EXACTLY

21 posted on 06/20/2006 5:37:30 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik
Fortunately for us, most conservatives arent like you guys.


The 'Status Quo' crowd will be the most surprised when this thing raises it's ugly head. While people who seek to head off this travesty do the research, the rest giggle insanely with their self-assuradness and blind loyalty.
22 posted on 06/20/2006 5:49:07 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

It looks as if the borders that they are more intent on defending - probably for national security reasons - are the outer borders of all of North America.

Another consideration regarding national security concerns is that we get most of our oil from Canada and Mexico.

Bush has had a real mess dumped in his lap since he became president, and there are no "good" or "easy" options / solutions for him.

I do know that his #1 priority every day is his "duty" to protect the American people. That would NOT be the case with a RAT president.

172 posted on 05/19/2006 5:13:31 PM EDT by Matchett-PI http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1635014/posts?page=172#172


23 posted on 06/20/2006 5:49:13 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

A deal like this needs to be open from the gitgo. It should be discussed as it is drafted, not as a done deal.
Every detail should be open to scrutiny, and discussion.
You can bet that the planners are assuming the final product will go through, and they should not be allowed to feel that confident.


24 posted on 06/20/2006 9:59:03 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (LET ME DIE ON MY FEET, IN MY SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WorkerbeeCitizen; Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama; nopardons
OMGLOL
How were we supposed to know the G8 was calling all the shots when the CFR, OAS, and WTO were running interference?
25 posted on 06/20/2006 10:02:01 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Corsi and the other wackjobs have twisted this whole concept into something it is not.

Even if one is willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, it's tough to explain his certainty that this conspiracy exists while (by filing his FOIA request) all but admitting he doesn't have the whole story.

26 posted on 06/20/2006 10:05:02 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

The whole idea that President Bush is somehow negotiating the end of this country in secret and that he even has the power to implement such a harebrained scheme is beyond ridiculous.

It could not possibly happen.

Yet we have had a least a dozen threads here recently suggesting that this is precisely what's going on, and a bunch of idiots here are actually buying into it.

This is an IQ test.


27 posted on 06/20/2006 10:28:59 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Lucky guess? One speculation is as good as the next.


28 posted on 06/20/2006 10:29:02 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (No guns, No freedom. Any questions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush
Who do you think is behind this?

Who do you think?

29 posted on 06/20/2006 10:30:49 AM PDT by AmishDude (I am the King Nut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
This is an IQ test.

LOL . . . more like a DNC effort, in concert with some useful idiots, to cull our herd during an Election Year.

30 posted on 06/20/2006 10:32:05 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Sovereignty!


You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

31 posted on 06/20/2006 10:38:36 AM PDT by AmishDude (I am the King Nut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; Toddsterpatriot; Dog Gone

Interestingly enough, Jerome Corsi is FReeper jrlc. He stopped posting in August, 2004.

He's got a bunch of FRiends, though, posting his every WND piece on this.

Whatever you want to say about him, he isn't stupid. He's doing a fine job of marketing himself.


32 posted on 06/20/2006 10:39:05 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I'm not sure the nutbags buying this story have voted Republican in recent memory.


They're more into the spooky music candidates.


33 posted on 06/20/2006 10:39:12 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

C'mon, these guys want to have fun storming the castle.


34 posted on 06/20/2006 10:39:38 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

Their political ideology is just mostly dead.


35 posted on 06/20/2006 10:40:35 AM PDT by AmishDude (I am the King Nut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Yeah, but the usual suspects are treating tem as REALLY dead and going through their pockets for loose change.


36 posted on 06/20/2006 10:41:31 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

That's a purty flag...NOT


37 posted on 06/20/2006 10:41:56 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Whatever you want to say about him, he isn't stupid. He's doing a fine job of marketing himself.

I agree completely. It will be interesting to see how his book fares. Making the FOIA request now, instead of during the buzz of the last couple of weeks, or even earlier as he was ostensibly researching his book is a stroke of genius.

38 posted on 06/20/2006 10:42:33 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Making the FOIA request now, instead of during the buzz of the last couple of weeks, or even earlier as he was ostensibly researching his book is a stroke of genius.

FOIA requests take forever to adjudicate. If he's looking for that material for his book, the publication date is somewhere around 2018.

If, on the other hand, he doesn't want to bother with the FOIA material and merely engage in fact-free fear-mongering, then this is perfectly timed.

39 posted on 06/20/2006 10:44:29 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
He stopped posting in August, 2004.

I just knew there would be some good news on this thread!

40 posted on 06/20/2006 10:47:13 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Well, now there are some flying monkeys posting om his behalf so he doesn't look as if he's pimping.
41 posted on 06/20/2006 10:58:32 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
If, on the other hand, he doesn't want to bother with the FOIA material and merely engage in fact-free fear-mongering, then this is perfectly timed.

He either gets something useful or not.  If he does then he can strut.  If he doesn't then he can hold up the empty form as proof that there's  some high level cover-up going on.

win-win.

42 posted on 06/20/2006 11:12:47 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik
Fortunately, we still have committed conservatives like Jerome Corsi

He's been committed? What's the name of the institution? I'd like to send him some crossword puzzles or something.

43 posted on 06/20/2006 11:18:21 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Marriage is a wonderful institution for those who need to be committed. ~()):~)>


44 posted on 06/20/2006 11:19:21 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Even if one is willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, it's tough to explain his certainty that this conspiracy exists while (by filing his FOIA request) all but admitting he doesn't have the whole story.

The CSM is at this very moment planning Corsi's demise.

The North American Union can't be stopped!! The conspiracy will continue.

45 posted on 06/20/2006 11:23:59 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Tell the CSM I think it would be cool to use HAARP for this one.


46 posted on 06/20/2006 11:32:54 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

LOL


47 posted on 06/20/2006 11:42:21 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I just hope you guys will wait and see what he finds from the FOIA request.

In the meantime I urge you to read the reports. It is apparent that many of you have not.


48 posted on 06/20/2006 12:23:37 PM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Exactly


49 posted on 06/20/2006 12:29:23 PM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Filing a FOIA request is 'going hysterical'?

You seem to be the one who wants to hype up the drama. Get a grip.


50 posted on 06/20/2006 1:57:19 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie!'... till you can find a rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson