Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tancredo confronts 'super-state' effort, Demands full disclosure of White House
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | June 15, 2006 | WorldNetDaily.com

Posted on 06/19/2006 12:15:24 PM PDT by Marxbites

Responding to a WorldNetDaily report, Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., is demanding the Bush administration fully disclose the activities of an office implementing a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that apparently could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress.

As WND reported, the White House has established working groups, under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005.

The groups, however, have no authorization from Congress and have not disclosed the results of their work despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

Tancredo wants to know the membership of the SPP groups along with their various trilateral memoranda of understanding and other agreements reached with counterparts in Mexico and Canada.

Tancredo's decision has been endorsed by Jim Gilchrist, founder of the Minuteman Project.

"It's time for the Bush administration to come clean," Gilchrist told WND. "If President Bush's agenda is to establish a new North American union government to supersede the sovereignty of the United States, then the president has an obligation to tell this to the American people directly. The American public has a right to know."

Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."

WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing the SPP working groups nor any congressional committees taking charge of oversight.

Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: cuespookymusic; globalism; jbs; nafta; preciousbodilyfluids; sapandimpurify; tancredo; theboogeyman; trade; waytolink; wnd
more info at

http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_2239.shtml

1 posted on 06/19/2006 12:15:28 PM PDT by Marxbites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

Marking for later.

Wow.


2 posted on 06/19/2006 12:18:20 PM PDT by TheZMan (Proud supporter of the anti-conservopussy movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

Do you have a working link for the article?


3 posted on 06/19/2006 12:18:24 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

The deep question is how do make Mexico a first class country. This is something that Vincente Fox has brought up frequently recently.

The trouble is that no one quite sees that the very best thing we could do for Mexico is to send their now well trained citizens home.

Suddenly Mexico would have a skilled workforce who knew something about how a world class country worked.

Think these folk would propel a great leap forward for Mexico?

I do.

Basically the ruling class in Mexico will not change of its own volition--even if those changes were in its own interest. But it can be forced to change.

The Mexicans in the USA have had the picture of what a well run country looks like tatooed on the back of their eyeballs. And they'll have an idea of how to get there. Send them back to Mexico and they'll get a revolution in Mexico that'll do that country some good.

The shock troops for that would be the 12 million repatriated Mexican citizens. Having seen what a well run country looks like they would not want to be stuffed back in the old wineskin.

There's something more.

I follow water desalination research pretty closely. While water desalination costs have dropped to about a third of what they were 15 years ago--the rate at which prices will drop over the next seven years will accelerate considerably. imo in even the next five years we will see desalination costs drop to 1/10th of today's costs. Or even faster than the fall the 3/4 fall that the LLNL researchers suggest.
http://www.physorg.com/news67262683.html
Basically, the foundations are being laid today to make it economically feasable to to turn all the world's deserts green. (The proper way to look at this is to recall that cars, tv's and computers were at first rich men's toys but when prices came down they changed the world. Desalinised water is still relatively speaking -- a rich man's toy. But when the price drops sufficiently--desalinised water will change the world--because most deserts are right beside the ocean. Pumping the water 1000 miles inland will require that the scientists collapse the cost cracking out hydrogen from water. I think that this nut will be cracked sooner than desalination.)

imho cheap desalinised water will do for the republicans (if they can get this on their agenda or even the democrats if the pubbies drop the ball) what the great dam building projects & the tva of the 1930's & 40's did for democrats because 1/3 of the US is deserts. We would increase the habitable size of the USA by 1/3.

Dirt cheap desalinised water will also do things like make it possible to double the habitable size of Mexico.

And desalinated water in tandem with repatriation of now skilled Mexican citizens would propel Mexico into being a world class country.

Oh and one last thing. Mexico will need a stronger dose of of the Peruvian Hernando Desoto ideas on Property http://www.ild.org.pe/home.htm


4 posted on 06/19/2006 12:23:53 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I agree and like all you said.

Mexico needs to get a grip and get rid of the autocracy.


5 posted on 06/19/2006 12:39:17 PM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_2239.shtml

This is the same topic with links to others


6 posted on 06/19/2006 12:40:06 PM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

The link you provided was not correct. After searching I finally found the correct link and added it.

Please provide a working link, the correct title and correct source name for any published material you post and do so before you post.

Thanks.


7 posted on 06/19/2006 3:52:55 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson