I hadn't picked up on that angle.
Ann dissed the god of Darwinism and has its priesthood wailing and gnashing their teeth. One thing her book proves is that although the god of Darwinism is primarily a leftist cultural icon, there are people who consider themselves conservative (usually fiscally, not socially) who bow and scrape to that pointless and random deity as well.
All of your duststorm about "Darwinism" aside, Pope John Paul The Great would have disagreed with you re: science and evolution.
And - please don't misunderstand me for I do not mean to insult you - I would rely on his knowledge of the Lord a little more than I would on yours...
Ann dissed the god of Darwinism and has its priesthood wailing and gnashing their teeth. One thing her book proves is that although the god of Darwinism is primarily a leftist cultural icon, there are people who consider themselves conservative (usually fiscally, not socially) who bow and scrape to that pointless and random deity as well.
- - - -
Absolutely.
Nothing so dramatic. Just disappointment that a person hailed as a conservative icon is either very ignorant or very unsrupulous, or very both
But we conservatives do not place our trust in the inate goodness of others, so no biggie.