[Just mythoughts]

"Yes, because Ann is not seeking elected office she can afford to be inflammatory. I just hope her words don't backfire against elected Republicans the way Moore's words backfired against Kerry. Beyond my basic "mommy" expectation that we don't make personal attacks, I am very worried about the political implications of such attacks."

Ah you and I have different definitions of that word inflammatory. Ann sticks sharp 'pricks' into the hot air balloons of the liberal sacred donkeys. Now selecting those willing Jersey gals for the sole purpose of seeking the destruction of President Bush using government funds for their Soviet style commission was the ultimate over the top in inflaming my sensibilities. I have no issue with Ann exposing them for the attempted political coup these women willing used themselves and the deaths of their husbands for a political gain. Especially when all was based upon lies and a liberal cover-up.

Afford is an interesting word, because no one is government mandated to purchase her book or spend one second listening or watching her speak. Granted Ann is not for the faint hearted, we are at war, and there are days it is difficult to distinguish the ultimate end from liberalism and terrorism, both have such a destructive result.

[soccermom]

"I have no issue with Ann exposing them for the attempted political coup these women willing used themselves and the deaths of their husbands for a political gain." Nor do I. I do have an issue with Ann using personal attacks. She could have just as easily "exposed" them, without ad hominem arguments.

[A CA Guy]

Ann is not seeking elected office she can afford to be inflammatory.

She is a modern day Paul Revere alerting us to the dangers and devises of liberals.