Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
If the mother is willing to pay for continued life support, though futile, why won't the hospital agree?

Because further care would be futile. Hospitals are under no obligation to continue palliative care when there is no hope for recovery.

In Catholic theology, this child, on a ventilator, is receiving extraordinary means of life support, and there is no moral obligation to extend extraordinary means of care.

If the child could breathe on his own, but with a feeding tube, the hospital would be in a different situation, though it would still likely ask the mother to find a long-term care facility for him.

9 posted on 06/01/2006 7:35:57 AM PDT by sinkspur ( Don Cheech. Vito Corleone would like to meet you......Vito Corleone.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur

100% correct, my friend.


17 posted on 06/01/2006 7:46:55 AM PDT by joe fonebone (Time to bring back tar and feathering.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Hospitals are under no obligation to continue palliative care when there is no hope for recovery.

Your medical advice is almost as trustworthy as your religious guidance, Deacon. Do you even know what palliative care is?

25 posted on 06/01/2006 8:02:58 AM PDT by BykrBayb ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson