Andrea Clark died within days of the Houston hospital reconsidering its decision to evict her, thus proving that the original "futile care" decision was the correct one.
Will you acknowledge that this case is distinctly different from the two you mention above? A ventilator is REQUIRED for this child to breathe.
Take your pro-death badgering devil's advocacy to someone who cares.
I will not respond further to your baiting. I will not engage in debate designed to attack. I have watched you for too long and am aware of your techinques. But I will ask this:
Are you really a deacon?
"thus proving that the original "futile care" decision was the correct one."
Denying medical care to a sick person isn't justified simply because they died while still receiving care. We all go naturally at some point. There's a distinct difference between Ms. Clark's natural death and the hospitals desires to kill her.
Murder by ommision is never a "correct" decision.