To: xsmommy
I'm not sure the number registered means that much. I think the amount donated, the number of intelligent, thought-provoking posts, and to some around here, the number of photos of Catherine Zeta-Jones, is more significant.
162 posted on
01/30/2006 6:48:44 PM PST by
Chanticleer
(May you be gruntled and combobulated in 2006.)
To: Chanticleer
i think it is totally irrelevant.but obviously the rocket scientist TROLL wanted something done and jimrob did the opposite and i think that is great!
163 posted on
01/30/2006 6:49:51 PM PST by
xsmommy
To: Chanticleer
>> ...the number of photos of Catherine Zeta-Jones, is more significant.
Y'know, that's an amazing coincidence. I used to wonder what the number crunchers meant by the term, "statistically significant." Then I got a look at Catherine Zeta-Jones's statistics.
182 posted on
01/30/2006 8:23:07 PM PST by
T'wit
(You wonder why there is so little news on Sunday mornings? The leftist news fakers are asleep.)
To: Chanticleer
photos of Catherine Zeta-Jones
There are rules, y'know?
188 posted on
01/31/2006 6:11:08 AM PST by
BJClinton
(This tagline will self-desruct in thirty sec...*boom*)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson