No evidence is no evidence. You may be comfortable with no evidence, but you cannot berate the rest of us who would like to see some evidence of something.
Have you read anything this past week of all the support she's received from well known conservatives who know her and conservative organizations who support her and all the things she's done in her life professionally and personlly? The only side of this argument lacking any edivence to support their conserns is the idea that she isn't conservative. There isn't evidence to back that up. There is TONS of evidence that she is a conservative evangelical Christian with a 30 year record to back that up. You're arguing for the side which has no evidence to base it's opinion on. The evidence that does exist at this time, suggests that she would be a good conservative Justice like Scalia and Thomas in rational and belief. That has been well established the past week many times, and I'm sick of pointing out the same facts over and over.