To: Publius6961
I knew I'd get flack for this one, but how did you now get the number up to 300,000?
15 posted on
01/04/2005 12:58:26 PM PST by
Williams
To: Williams
No flack from me, I agree with you. I've been trying to tune some of it out.
30 posted on
01/04/2005 1:04:15 PM PST by
beandog
(Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out)
To: Williams
I knew I'd get flack for this one, but how did you now get the number up to 300,000?I've seen estimates ranging from 100k to 500k... we don't yet know the full extent of the damage, although we have a clearer picture now than before. When it first struck, people thought only 20k might have died.
68 posted on
01/04/2005 1:19:31 PM PST by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: Williams
I kind of wonder about the numbers getting padded based on "we didn't see anyone in that village". How do they explain 500K in shelters? They had to come from somewhere. They, the nameless faceless they, reported that the aboriginal tribes of Andaman and Nicobar must have been annihilated because they couldn't see them near the coast. However, people throwing sticks and stones at helicopters proved them wrong. Because the tribes headed for higher ground.
79 posted on
01/04/2005 1:23:32 PM PST by
Jaded
(Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society. - Mark Twain)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson