Posted on 12/15/2004 11:23:15 AM PST by gopwinsin04
Actress Lindsay Lohan's people have been peddling the hard partying hottie to the skin sultans at Playboy.
But just days after her managers pitched Playboy, they backtracked saying their girl has a 'no nudity' clause in her Disney contract that extends through the release of 'Herbie the Love Bug: Fully Loaded.'
Earlier this week, Lohan, the latest 'It Girl' of the tabloids, told MSNBC that she's had enough exposure.
'If I could have one thing for the holidays, it would be for no tabloids to write anything about me,' the buxom 18 year old sniffed to the Scoop.
Lohan has experienced just about ever kind of scandal in the past month: breaking up with her first love, the frequent arrests of her annoying papa Michael, a hospital stay for exhaustion and a lip synching snafu while belting out her hit single on 'Good Morning America.'
(Excerpt) Read more at thetrack.bostonherald.com ...
Dang.
The bad news just keeps on coming today for TheBigB...
He's probably been freepmailing Bootyist Monk about taking orders.
Hmmm...
Well, if she doesn't want to do porn, then she's more respectable than many.
That said...I had some pretty nice mental pictures while typing this post!
Ahem. You know what is required.
In other news playboy's stock plummetted....
Give her about 5 years, when her "star" has crashed. She'll be in Playboy.
Pics!
You know the rules!
I doubt it, otherwise why would it violate a 'no nudity' clause?
Whatever. Playboy is not smut, I have been reading it for years and while Hugh Hefner is a *little* too liberal for me, the photo spreads are tasteful and airbrushed anyway. If it were Hustler or something else it would be different.
Actually, Lindsay was on Jay Leno's show Monday night, and she gave a different version. Jay said he heard about this second-hand as well. Lindsay said PB asked her to do a 20 QUESTIONS piece...not a nude pictorial. But she politely rejected that as well.
Nex week, heck...I got that issue on the newsstand -last- week! :-)
Playboy has stated in their financial reports that they are going to go after younger stars and not rely on has beens to drive the magazine, since they've been getting clobbered by no-nudity FHM, Maxim, Stuff
She's already well on her way there!
is that real?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
