Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What DELAYED Kerry's Discharge for Six Years?
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | Aug. 27, 2004 | Thomas Lipsomb

Posted on 08/27/2004 4:21:09 PM PDT by ketchikan

94 Pages of Records Unreleased:

Questions have been raised about President Bush's drill attendance in the reserves, but Bush received his honorable discharge on schedule. Kerry, who should have been discharged from the Navy about the same time -- July 1, 1972 -- wasn't given the discharge he has on his campaign Web site until July 13, 1978. What delayed the discharge for six years? This raises serious questions about Kerry's performance while in the reserves that are far more potentialy damaging than those raised against Bush.

(Excerpt) Read more at suntimes.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: discharge; kerry; militaryrecords

1 posted on 08/27/2004 4:21:09 PM PDT by ketchikan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ketchikan

I was wondering when I would finally see something on this. Big BTTT.


2 posted on 08/27/2004 4:22:06 PM PDT by truthkeeper (Yeah, I have a 1998 signup date. So?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ketchikan

AWOL?!?!?!?!


3 posted on 08/27/2004 4:22:24 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ketchikan
What delayed Kerry's discharge for six years?

Uhhh....Viagra hadn't been invented yet?

4 posted on 08/27/2004 4:24:07 PM PDT by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Worse... My guess is some form of disciplinary action and procedure, which was probably dropped due to political pressure from Democrats.


5 posted on 08/27/2004 4:25:41 PM PDT by coconutt2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ketchikan

Kerry's discharge was probably delayed when some bureaucrat at the Pentagon changed the title of the thread they were posting.

"Plot thickens after checking records"


6 posted on 08/27/2004 4:25:59 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

No! Stupid! Stupid! Stupid! Journalist! 1987 - 1972 = 6. We had a six year obligation back then. You got released form active duty, and but were not finally discharged until the full six years was up.


7 posted on 08/27/2004 4:26:29 PM PDT by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ketchikan
What delayed the discharge for six years?

It's called a committment to the inactive reserve. I was drafted for two years in 1952. After I was discharged I had a six or eight year committment to the inactive reserve. I forget which. Didn't affect me one way the other.

8 posted on 08/27/2004 4:27:01 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ketchikan
What DELAYED Kerry's Discharge for Six Years?

They had to find him first? The coward was probably AWOL.

9 posted on 08/27/2004 4:27:11 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (Life is not about how fast you run, or how high you climb, but how well you bounce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

I'm sure the press will give this the same level of coverage it gave to the Bush AWOL story.


10 posted on 08/27/2004 4:29:36 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree
Kerry simply changed his address and didn't notify DOD about it. In pre computer days it wasn't all that easy to track someone down.

I'd notified DOD of an address change just a few weeks before getting my final discharge (after 6 years of obligation), but they used my old address, and the piece had to be forwarded.

The letter carrier who marked up the piece ran a ballpoint pen through the glassine window and defaced my discharge.

This was done on purpose by someone who didn't like veterans of that period.

I had him fired!

11 posted on 08/27/2004 4:40:37 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

Kerry enlisted in '66. 78-66=12. War basically ended in '73 and was totally over in '75. Whats Kerry doing in IR until 78????


12 posted on 08/27/2004 4:44:23 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Donate to the Swifties, once again serving the nation selflessly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ketchikan

Obviously George Bush and Halliburton.


13 posted on 08/27/2004 4:57:13 PM PDT by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Kerry simply changed his address and didn't notify DOD about it. In pre computer days it wasn't all that easy to track someone down.

I'm sure you're right, but I like my explanation better. LOL :-)

14 posted on 08/27/2004 5:18:22 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (Life is not about how fast you run, or how high you climb, but how well you bounce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Well, the Navy was pretty screwed up back then. I had only 1 month left on my 6 year obligation when I was transfered to the inactive reserve, as a LTJG, in June 1974. In about 1976 they promoted me to LT, and I tried to refuse the appointment because I would have had to to take a physical, and I was too busy putting the FCS Mk 113 Mod 10 on the Los Angeles. They told me that I still had six years to do from when I transfered to the inactive reserve, so I took the physical and the promotion. The same thing must have happened to Kerry.

Not everything about his service is a big deal, or questionable.


15 posted on 08/27/2004 5:27:19 PM PDT by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
Not everything about his service is a big deal, or questionable.

I agree. I was an emnlisted grunt so I don't know but didn't Navy Gentleman :}, incur an additional 6 year obligation at time of war?

16 posted on 08/27/2004 5:36:28 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Donate to the Swifties, once again serving the nation selflessly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

I've been wondering how Kerry went through OCS, served from 1966-1970, and appears not to have any Reserve time. Would he have had to do yearly ACDUTRA?


17 posted on 08/27/2004 5:38:58 PM PDT by pieces of time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ketchikan

No need to release all those darn military records. They're way too confusing for the voters anyway. Lanny Davis will take quick peak, and make sure nothing is amiss.


18 posted on 08/27/2004 5:56:02 PM PDT by raised by wolves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieces of time
The RESERVES WERE FULL!

I've tried time and again to make this point, during the Viet Nam War, filling the reserve components were NOT A PROBLEM.

In my case I was exempted from any reserve duty after my active duty in the Infantry! Of course I had to ask for it, but they were more than willing to give it.

Recall, if you will, not everybody in the military at that time (Viet Nam War Era(s)) agreed with the way the Democrats had conducted the war. Slightly fewer agreed with the way the Republicans conducted it.

The government had worked real hard to make defending the country an undesirable occupation. We've all spent the last 35 years fixing that situation. Some, like Kerry, seem to have "gone over" however. That's not to be forgotten.

19 posted on 08/28/2004 4:11:48 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson