Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ben & Jen Split (Affleck & Lopez are no more!)
Entertainment Tonight ^ | January 22, 2004 | Entertainment Tonight

Posted on 01/22/2004 2:43:59 PM PST by pittsburgh gop guy

Ben & Jen Split

January 22, 2004

ET has learned that BEN AFFLECK and JENNIFER LOPEZ are Bennifer no more. Today, a representative for Lopez told ET, "I am confirming the reports that Jennifer Lopez has ended her engagement to Ben Affleck. At this difficult time, we ask that you respect her privacy."

Next week's Us magazine is reporting the particulars of the breakup. The tumultuous 18-month romance purportedly ended Jan. 20, just three days after Ben returned to Los Angeles from the Sundance Film Festival. The decision was reportedly mutual.

One reason for the final demise of the relationship is said to be Jennifer's desire to settle down and have a baby. Another, according to Us, was her chagrin at Ben's partying ways. The latest incident cited was Ben and pal MATT DAMON's night out in Berlin, where the two were photographed being admired by a bevy of women.

Fascination with the couple's status began to surface nearly two years ago. In July of 2002, less than two months after Jen's split with husband No. 2 was announced, Ben threw Jen a party for her 33rd birthday and presented her with a HARRY WINSTON bracelet of yellow and gold diamonds. When Ben proposed in the fall, he left no romantic stone unturned. He took her to his mom's Boston-area home, which was decorated with rose petals. Jen's music was playing in the background. He then began to read a letter detailing the reasons why he loved her before getting down on one knee and presenting her with the famous 6-carat, pink-diamond, engagement ring.

Ben and Jen, as you'll recall, were supposed to tie the knot Sept. 14 on the California coast, but abruptly canceled their plans just days before the ceremony. Despite the couple's efforts to keep the wedding under wraps by having vendors sign confidentiality agreements and refusing to tell the 400 guests the location of the event, details of the celebration began to leak at a break-neck pace. As news spread, hotel rooms in and around the usually quiet seaside town of Santa Barbara, CA, were sold out as the media moved in.

Then, four days before the wedding, the couple confirmed they were delaying their nuptials and blamed the intense media scrutiny for their decision. In a joint statement, they said, "Due to the excessive media attention surrounding our wedding, we have decided to postpone the date. When we found ourselves seriously contemplating hiring three separate 'decoy brides' at three different locations, we realized that something was awry. We felt what should have been a joyful and sacred day could be spoiled for us, our family and our friends." Insiders led ET to believe that Jennifer personally made the calls to advise guests and was said to be very upset and difficult to understand through her tears.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: affleck; benaffleck; jenniferlopez; jlo
SAY IT AIN'T SO!

I think their engagement lasted longer than a couple of her marriages though....

1 posted on 01/22/2004 2:44:00 PM PST by pittsburgh gop guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy

How will I live?

2 posted on 01/22/2004 2:45:32 PM PST by Petronski (I'm *NOT* always *CRANKY.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
J-Lo hauls ass?

3 posted on 01/22/2004 2:49:29 PM PST by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
My theory...

Ben got tired of Jen asking him if her jeans made her butt look big everyday.
4 posted on 01/22/2004 3:12:01 PM PST by socal_parrot (http://www.campbellforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
She told him she had lost 20 pounds and then walked away from him.
He watched her walk away and said "I found it"
Yes I know, an old joke.
5 posted on 01/22/2004 3:13:02 PM PST by Embedded Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
Gee! I just hope they don't stop making movies together!
6 posted on 01/22/2004 3:16:44 PM PST by VadeRetro (Said it on the pulled dupe of this thread already, I know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Embedded Freeper
Yes I know, an old joke.

Works for me...


7 posted on 01/22/2004 3:20:00 PM PST by socal_parrot (http://www.campbellforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
You're bad.
8 posted on 01/22/2004 3:21:49 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Come see the violence inherent in the system!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
Nooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
9 posted on 01/22/2004 3:38:33 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
All I can say is, thank goodness. I was really getting tired of hearing about these two nitwits.
10 posted on 01/22/2004 4:06:03 PM PST by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
Who Cares !
11 posted on 01/22/2004 4:27:03 PM PST by bamafan93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
Ah, so I wasn't the only one... (*grin*)
12 posted on 01/22/2004 4:27:08 PM PST by KangarooJacqui (taglines are for people who care about this kinda stuff...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy


why? Why? WHY?

now there will never be "Gigli 2" ... *sniff*
13 posted on 01/22/2004 6:16:12 PM PST by Bobby777 (no, I didn't see 'Gigli' ... but it might be shown at Guantanamo ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
I have never thought her butt was too big.
But the fact that she looks pretty good overall doesn't attract me; her mind is definitely too small.
All these Hollywood types (and any woman for that matter) who need to attract men with their bodies are lacking in qualities no Conservative would go for.
OK, from watching Free Republic for years there are a few exceptions.
14 posted on 01/22/2004 7:01:52 PM PST by Embedded Freeper (Men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Embedded Freeper
lacking in qualities no Conservative would go for.

True. One thing though, if Anna Kournikova is not a consevative, it would a lot of fun trying to get her there.


15 posted on 01/22/2004 7:20:57 PM PST by socal_parrot (http://www.campbellforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
Ha ha ha!
It would be worth a try to "turn" her.
I'd be her ball boy anytime.
Kramer will have to sit this one out.
16 posted on 01/22/2004 7:32:40 PM PST by Embedded Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson