Posted on 12/14/2003 1:12:39 PM PST by draftowens08
New to the community here. Looks like a fun place to talk.
I thought I'd start a discussion of possible GOP candidates to replace (hopefully) W. To start, here is a list off the top of my head:
Chance of running in ()
Dick Cheney (highly unlikely) Colin Powell (highly unlikely) Condi Rice (below average) George Pataki (high) Jeb Bush (high) Bill Owens (high) Rick Santorum (average) Bill Frist (average) Rudy Giuliani (below average) George Allen (average)
My favorties are Bush and Owens. I'd be shocked to see either Cheney or Powell run. Rice, if she didn't run, would be an interesting VP candidate. Imagine how angry the Dems would be that a Republican would be the first black/woman VP. Pataki wouldn't go over well in the south. Bush has all the fundraising power in the world. I don't think he has the skills of his brother though. Owens is by far my favorite. Without a doubt the best governor in the country. Santorum and Frist are probably VP candidates. Giuliani probably isn't qualified IMO but a well known and liked figure. Allen is probably a VP candidate also. Plus I'm not sure congressmen can do well in presidential election anymore.
Thoughts?
You might check out the HTML sandbox and lurk a bit to become acclimated to the FR culture.
I generally agree with your post but would like to wait a while before worrying about 2008.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
It may be sooner for Rice than you think.
Pataki - NOT!
If we play our cards right, it won't matter who we run or they run, the 2008 election will go our way. And so will 2012, 2016, 2020....
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
I have to disagree with NVA and others who would have us pick a candidate before the primaries. I think a good, competitive primary is good for the party and for the country. The last truly competitive primary for the GOP was in '80, and that primary produced our best president in many decades. The rush to force a candidate on the party before the primaries start just adds to people's being disillusioned with the whole process.
I think we'll have to look closely at possibilities during the next two to three years. I think President Bush should keep Vice-President Cheney for the next term. He won't be a candidate in '08, and his being VP will keep someone else from becoming the heir apparent too quickly. Allen and Gilmore in Virginia are both good possibilities for '08. Frist might make a run. I can't remember the names right now, but I'd look at some of the Class of '02 senators who were elected last year. Wasn't Jim Talent of Missouri a former governor? If so, he'd be a very strong candidate.
WFTR
Bill
My concern is that we are not doing much to develop a well-stocked field from which to choose. Look at all the ground-work being done by the dwarfs with little hope of succeeding. I'd like to see more grooming going on so we are not starting from a dead stop in '05.
Remember, in '08 the situation will be reversed with Hillary! getting the RAT's nod by acclimation and we will have the uphill battle. Meanwhile, the Pubs will have knock down drag out fights for ascendancy with a possible third party run by a certain senator with disdain for the first amendment (unless he plans to be her veep).
Maybe we will see some cabinet moves early into GWB's second term that will calm my fears. We'll see.
First, I agree that the country was exposed to Ronald Reagan before 1980, but I think the real substance of that exposure was his eight years as governor of California. He had real executive experience even though he had no experience in the federal government. The 1976 election made a few more people familiar with him, but his real strength and recognition came from being a two-term governor of California. However, I agree with your point that there is no one like him who has been a successful two-term governor of a large state.
Thirdly, I don't think that the primary has to be an ugly knock-down, drag-out event as long as people campaign with a reasonable amount of dignity. I don't remember things being all that ugly in '96 when Dole faced five or six challengers. Things were ugly in 2000 primarily because people who disagreed with then-Governor Bush on some point felt that their concerns were being ignored in the rush to select a nominee without considering all of the issues. I don't remember the '80 primary being all that ugly either, but I admit that I didn't follow it as closely.
Finally, I'm not at all worried about McCain in 2008. I think he's looked to be in poor health for some time, and I won't be surprised if his health forces him into retirement from all politics by 2008. If he did run as a third-party candidate, I'm not sure that he wouldn't hurt the Democrats as much as he'd hurt the Republicans. Many of the people who like his ideas are liberals. They won't be voting for a Republican under any circumstances, but McCain might keep them from voting for Hillary.
WFTR
Bill
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.