Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

This is so simple, even a caveman could understand it. There is NO WAY to adequately audit and verify what an electronic voting machine is doing at the digital level. One tiny line of imbedded code, either software or firmware, hidden in the device, can manipulate vote totals without anyone being the wiser. Otherwise, why is simple counting software so complex that it has to be considered ‘proprietary’ to the manufacturer?


5 posted on 05/02/2024 2:01:59 PM PDT by rottndog (What comes after America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rottndog

“There is NO WAY to adequately audit and verify what an electronic voting machine is doing”

Incorrect. The ballots still exist after being counted. You can audit by hand counting, which was done.

The way the steal was done was by inserting phony ballots. That is why chain of custody is essential.

All the stuff about Dominion and voting machines is misdirection likely created by the Deep State to direct people away from the real scene of the crime.


15 posted on 05/02/2024 6:03:57 PM PDT by Renfrew (Muscovia delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson