The federal Goverment says Paxton and the three individual plaintiffs have no standing. The Fifth circuit is going to hear the oral arguments on standing.
When the government makes this argument, they should be required to also say who they think would have standing. And really, the States should have standing on any issue.
5 posted on 04/30/2024 6:09:47 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
The Biden administration say it is a tax matter, and they cannot have standing until they apply for a tax stamp and are denied.
The plaintiffs contend the requirement to apply, pay for a tax stamp, and submit to serial number requirements *are* infringements which constitute irrevocable harm,and thus they have standing.
6 posted on 04/30/2024 6:13:03 PM PDT by marktwain
(The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )