Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
The federal Goverment says Paxton and the three individual plaintiffs have no standing. The Fifth circuit is going to hear the oral arguments on standing.

When the government makes this argument, they should be required to also say who they think would have standing. And really, the States should have standing on any issue.
5 posted on 04/30/2024 6:09:47 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Svartalfiar
The Biden administration say it is a tax matter, and they cannot have standing until they apply for a tax stamp and are denied.

The plaintiffs contend the requirement to apply, pay for a tax stamp, and submit to serial number requirements *are* infringements which constitute irrevocable harm,and thus they have standing.

6 posted on 04/30/2024 6:13:03 PM PDT by marktwain (The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson