Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

“Not at all, originally it was going to be a well-oiled modernized, restructured, Russian military pulling off a quick and clean low casualty operation, with some possible weeks of mopping up any stray resistance that resisted the new government, a display to the world of the new Russia and its new, modern military.”

That paragraph translates to Ruzzia is a threat.

“Nobody expected that it would turn into the bloodiest European war since WWII and that it would drag on for years and become a war of attrition that would drain the old Soviet stocks of armor and artillery and of massive Naval and Air losses.”

That translates to Ruzzia is not a threat.

Which paragraph is true Zeeper?


38 posted on 04/05/2024 3:45:02 PM PDT by tennmountainman ( (“Less propaganda would be appreciated.” JimRob 12-2-2023 DITTO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: tennmountainman

You don’t read very well, Russia is a threat, getting tied up in a quagmire for a few years or suffering setbacks does not change that, read those posts again.

I guess you don’t recognize that a strong national defense American with strategic views on the Russia/China threats can be just that, as I say, my interest is in the Russia and China threats, you seem to see Ukraine versus Russia as some sort of choosing teams for your rah-rah emotional trolling, that doesn’t appeal to me or interest me.


39 posted on 04/05/2024 3:53:10 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson