Posted on 03/18/2024 11:33:14 AM PDT by Sam77
Nope not me. I think you’re replying to the wrong person.
I think you are, too!
I’ve (along with a handful of others, here) been warning about these horrid $hots, before they were even released.
Glad to hear you didn’t fall for the propaganda, either.
Take care.
That “handful” here is what got me exploring this more in depth through links to doctors sounding the alarm etc. long before the actual vaccines were rolled out. No freaking way was I getting poked with something THAT experimental and untested. No. Freaking. Way.
Re: 3 - Nooooooo!!!
It’s more fun to be hysterical!!!
Did you mean referenced - I didn’t see it actually linked in the article (for good reason since it did not show what was claimed).
Yet some of the usual suspects are here clapping like trained seals as usual because it fits a narrative - once again regardless of facts and regardless of truth.
Be careful at this site. I hit two of the other links and got security warnings and refusal to open on both. I have Vipre security. I’m not going to it again.
Sequoyah101 wrote: “I’m not able to see that linked study. Can you point it out or provide the link?”
Click on disswire dot com. In that article you’ll find this statement:
Since the vaccine rollout, nearly every country around the world has experienced a surge in “aggressive cancers” in those under 50 years old.
The word ‘those’ opens another article which states that ““Between 1990 and 2019, cases of cancer in young people across the globe have increased by 79 percent and deaths have risen 28 percent.””
THAT …. Is GREAT, to hear!!
Good for you!! 💞
See post #13
interesting from the article some recent anecdotal hard numbers:
“Pavic said that 65 percent of all carcinoma cases among those aged between 15 and 59 received one or more COVID injections, with a 55 percent vaccination rate overall in the same age group.
This means that those vaccinated have a 52 percent increased chance of getting cancer.
...
“It’s important to note that all newly diagnosed carcinomas took the jab in 2021. In my hospital, we had 780 newly diagnosed carcinomas in the age group 55 and younger, with 560 of whom took one or more jabs. So this is 65% of the overall number of cancer diagnoses who took the jab.”
“What I found interesting was 150 of those people were diagnosed with cancer within six months of taking the jab,....”
the article says 65% higher odds for younger adults (the video has a tag of 52%. not so sure of that. didn’t see their math so i’ll do it my way: in her hospital, the delta is 65-35 = 30%. so of the 65 in a hundred who got cancer in the jab group, statistically there should have only been 65*.30= 19.5 cancers due to the natural odds. 65/30 = 1.49 so i get about a 49% increase, which is still very bad.
the article puts NZ and AUS at the top of the list. both of those are islands. so the least likely to have big out breaks (yes i know they are catching up now with a fury) and, suspiciously, the countries with the most enforced lockdowns and jab coercion (outside of maybe Israel), therefore the least amt of wuhan but the most amount of jabs. anecdotal but convincing enough to anyone with a modicum of common sense, i.e. any man, as CSL says, who possesses a ‘chest.’
Re: post 15 above - that is 1990 to 2019, that is. (90, 78...jumped over two keys).
I see what you mean now...
But, it was also quick to find the same study on another search as well.
More fake narratives from the usual crowd. Far from the first time citing a study that actually has completely different data than what they portrayed and far from the first claim that would have required the vaccine to have travelled through time.
Thanks for posting. Nuremberg 2.0
If only these victims got 10 booster, they would fully heal! (/S)
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=h_&q=cancer+rates+in+young+people+soared+by+79+percent&ia=web
Apparently they count on the fact many people won’t look it up and see what the study actually showed, and the time period for which the data was collected.
Narrative over all else. Care about facts and truth - you must be a shill / propagandist!
“If only these victims got 10 booster, they would fully heal! (/S)”
Indeed - the time travelling vaccine strikes again!
Data from 1990 to 2019 - the only logical conclusion is that it must have been caused by a vaccine given in starting in 2021... < / s >
In the Bloggers & Personal forum, on a thread titled Top Doctor Blows Whistle on Exploding Cancer Rates: ‘Vaccinated Are Dying’, DugwayDuke wrote: From the article: “Amid recent reports of exploding cancer rates around the world, a recent revelation from a top pathologist has shed light on the “phenomenon” affecting many of those who received the COVID-19 vaccine.”
From the linked study: “Between 1990 and 2019, cases of cancer in young people across the globe have increased by 79 percent and deaths have risen 28 percent.”
So, this increase has nothing to do with COVID or COVID vaccines despite the hysterical article headlines.
Of course you're distorting the article - it's what you do.
"Since the vaccine rollout, nearly every country around the world has experienced a surge in “aggressive cancers” in those under 50 years old."
"Pavic said that 65 percent of all carcinoma cases among those aged between 15 and 59 received one or more COVID injections, with a 55 percent vaccination rate overall in the same age group.
This means that those vaccinated have a 52 percent increased chance of getting cancer.
“You don’t expect to have lots of malignant diseases diagnosed in the 15 – 55 age group; you expect to diagnose such diseases in the age group 64 and older.”
“It’s important to note that all newly diagnosed carcinomas took the jab in 2021. In my hospital, we had 780 newly diagnosed carcinomas in the age group 55 and younger, with 560 of whom took one or more jabs. So this is 65% of the overall number of cancer diagnoses who took the jab.”
Ok, thanks.
ransomnote wrote: “Of course you’re distorting the article - it’s what you do.”
You have no room for accusing others of distortion:
From Health Feedback:
CLAIM: “Pathologist reports a stunning 52% increase in cancer risk for ages 15-59 who were vaxxed”
Conclusion
Pavic’s analysis contains several flaws that invalidate its conclusions. It didn’t take into consideration the possible effect of confounding factors, such as age and health-seeking behaviors, that could influence both the likelihood of getting vaccinated and the likelihood of a cancer diagnosis. It also used an improperly calculated vaccine coverage of the general population as a baseline to assess whether vaccinated individuals are overrepresented among cancer patients.
Furthermore, Pavic’s analysis and Kirsch’s conclusions are at odds with observations from medical experts, who haven’t observed an increase in cancer following COVID-19 vaccination to date . Observations available to date show that COVID-19 vaccines are safe with benefits in terms of protection against severe diseases outweighing their risks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.