Yes, but isn’t that an issue for the county and the state regarding the use of public funds? Fire her for that yes, recover the money, unlikely. But again, it doesn’t affect the case itself.
Yes it does, because her true motivation in prosecuting Trump was to keep the money spigot open. A case like Trump’s is allowed a much bigger budget and billable hours because of it’s “seriousness” i.e. notoriety.
A regular case against Joe Schmoe wouldn’t rate so much griftable expenses.
“Yes, but isn’t that an issue for the county and the state regarding the use of public funds? Fire her for that yes, recover the money, unlikely. But again, it doesn’t affect the case itself.”
Okay, let me spell this out for you: There is no case against Trump. The reason the charges were brought was as a means of facilitating money laundering for the benefit of Fani Willis.
Remove her from the case and there is no case.