LOL. Listen to you. Even if you listen to your full argument, claiming that he didn't want to terminate the WHOLE Constitution, just a few parts of it, it's still outrageous. No parts of the Constitution should be terminated, for Trump or anyone else.
There's simply nothing that Trump says or does that you will ever disagree with. You'll just quickly rationalize it all away, one way or another, on some reason he's supposedly always a victim. I'm done with all that myself. Endless victimhood is what leftists do.
If the election was stolen, right out from under his nose, what a real man would do is try to fix it. Not cry about it, and just let it happen again, or blame us if we can't "out vote the cheating" like he says is the only solution. Bull hockey. He's just setting us up to lose, again.
I already agreed it was a mistake for him to use the word “terminated” he should have said “waived”.
In the interest of getting past a silly argument over word choice, let me ask you a couple of yes and no questions:
1) Do you believe the 2020 election results in several states were wrongly certified?
2) If so, do you believe the Constitution required that those certifications be accepted by the electoral college anyway?
3) According to Article II Section I of the Constitution, “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of Electors….”
Some people believe this language means that once a state has certified electors, they must be accepted by the electoral college without question. That even if the state’s election was proven fraudulent, there is no Constitutional remedy. Do you agree with that?