Posted on 12/11/2023 7:58:14 AM PST by Macho MAGA Man
From the report:
[“Freeman was also questioned about her alleged social media posts; however, she wanted to speak with an attorney before proceeding any further on that issue. She stated the situation was bad due to the alleged posts, and that she had received over 500 emails, text messages, and was being harassed by having unsolicited pizza orders sent to her house. People were also calling her neighbors and questioning them about her. Freeman was asked to review some social media posts, but she declined to answer further questions until she retained an attorney,” the FBI report read.]
Rudy Giuliani did not expose Ruby’s name during his Georgia hearing. And now we know that Ruby blamed the alleged harassment and abuse she received on the fake social media accounts set up using her name!
Rudy had NOTHING to do with the alleged harassment she received.
* * * * * * * * * *
Now it gets really interesting…
Chris Wray’s FBI, the GBI and GA SOS interviewed the individual who created the fake Ruby Freeman social media page and published totally fabricated posts that allegedly were put up by Ruby Freeman.
(For the record, The Gateway Pundit did not post these social media reports at the time because they were completely over the top. We knew they were likely fake.)
Here is what is interesting: The FBI interviewed the “man” who created the fake Ruby Freeman account, but they NEVER named him in the report. His name was redacted for some reason?
From the report:
“He created the @rubyfreeman Georgia account but did not write the specific post regarding tampering with the 2020 election,” according to the FBI report.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Rudy still lost hugely with legal fees.
Christopher Wray, not so much.
So why is the NY Post (yeah, I know, it leans lefty) running a prominent article about a NY jury slamming Guiliani for falsely accusing Ruby Freeman and her daughter? We all saw the video showing her waiting for the Republican ballot counters to leave before removing a suitcase of fake ballots from beneath the table.
NY jury slamming Guiliani for falsely accusing Ruby Freeman and her daughter
Need you or anyone else say anything more?
If this is accurate, then we, the citizens, face greater peril than initially believed.
Lock Wray up ... like the J6ers.
We all also saw them running batches of ballots through the tabulator multiple times for each batch.
The NY Post is another Murdoch owned publication, and Murdoch is against Trump big time.
Payback could be a bitch. I hope he sues everyone involved.
Bank tellers need to learn to hand over the money to bank robbers and keep their mouths shut—otherwise the Democrats will indict them for interfering with a bank withdrawal.
Chris Wrays days are numbered.
He deserves the same fate as the Upenn president. Resign now.
It won’t make a bit of difference. The narrative is set.
Only to be replaced by a bigger weasel…
Let’s hope not.
“The narrative is set.”
Yup—this is how “history” is done—a pack of lies created by people with power to support their agenda.
It is a great lesson—I hope Freepers are learning from it.
Ballots themselves do not have unique identifying numbers. But it seems like the data logs from the scanning machines could be used to test whether the same ballots were,scnned nd counted more than once.
1) The time the scanning ballots were recorded should correlate to the time the multi-scanning is shown on the surveillance videos.
2) Stacks of ballots run through the counter multiple times would seem likely to have patterns of votes. Each ballot had multiple offices; these would have specific votes or non-votes for each race. The net ballot in the stack would have it own collection of specific votes and/or omitted votes, and so on. If batches of vote counts in the log repeat these patterns, it will be obvious that the stcks were counted multiple times.
I get the sense that the data analysis to find this was never done. Wonder why... Was Giuliani able to subpoena the digital records? Seems like they are critically important for his defense.
The retribution will be thorough.
We all saw the security system videos.
We all saw them.
We ALL saw them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.