Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Fossil

From the article… vaccine effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines then available for COVID would be in the range of 66% (44% failure to protect)

First, 66% effectiveness means a 34% failure rate, not a 44% failure rate. Simple typo? Deliberate distortion from Malone? Who knows. May it was a peer reviewed article in an open source journal where if your check cashed you get published.

However in this we can discern the truth which is what any analysis of data attempts to do. I do note that breakthrough infection of delta recalling that the vaccination was for wildtype. But what is being missed is that the protection from the vaccination for alpha though two generations subsequent was still effective at preventing progress to critical illness.

This data fails to comment on it but is consistent with my observations at the time for which I was maligned. The truth is that we did see breakthrough infection. It now appears to be quantified as 34%. Seems a little high and the data presented has some variance but I can accept that number. Of the breakthrough infections, it was exceedingly rare that a patient would progress to life threatening illness. In understanding this data we now have some realistic approximation is the truth. That truth is that the vaccine was protective against the disease 2/3 of the time (not bad for a vaccination that is two generations of evolution behind a rapidly mutating virus) AND virtually 100% effective against lethality if breakthrough occurred.

Seems to me like this is quite supportive of the vaccination and vindication for PDJT. It was his creation after all and despite being maligned by supporters here for it being his big mistake, he can affirm that the vaccine indeed saved countless lives.


8 posted on 10/30/2023 3:29:34 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gas_dr

Well, Duuuhh!

He only referenced published data from the Government agencies and the drug companies. Has nothing to do with peer review.

This is a time line he was asked to make for attorney’s to use in filing lawsuits.

I don’t care if you like or believe Dr. Malone.

You will not talk down to me.

If you don’t like the article I posted just ignore the article and go somewhere else.

I don’t argue over these discussions. You make No Sale here.


9 posted on 10/30/2023 3:40:01 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas is not about where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind and Attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

Get stuffed .

There are all kinds of gifs of Pfauci and others promising 100% effectiveness.

Which were the rationale for the mandates, as well as hyped fear of the death rate.


10 posted on 10/30/2023 5:46:43 PM PDT by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson