[Red6]

Napolitano served as a New Jersey Superior Court judge from 1987 to 1995: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Napolitano

He actually explains the reason why the 4th amendment is in place, he explains how it was historically perceived, and he explains how the Intel Community flagrantly circumnavigates the law.

What is crummy is just a personal attack.

[Alberta's Child]

I would point out that the 2018 Supreme Court case referenced in this article was Carpenter v. United States. The Court decided in favor of the defendant who claimed that the use of third-party cell phone data by the government was a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.

Chief Justice Roberts joined with the four liberals on the Court in the 5-4 majority.

Kennedy, Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch were the four dissenting judges.

[isthisnickcool]

Gee, he was a “judge” 30 years ago? Was he a paperboy prior to that? If yes can we refer to him as “Paperboy Napolitano”?

The usage of a prior job or position to refer to someone in the media is a media construct to give heft to someone the media is using for content. I’ve heard this “judge” spew this or that on TV for years and his “content” is usually just no better than using a regular google search. This “judge” is a puffer fish.