Given that they were doing it *AFTER* the legal date it could be done, does it matter? One can only assume when they are breaking the law, it is for nefarious reasons.
In a court of law, yes, it would. I agree it appears pretty obvious what they were doing, but how do you know, for sure? Proof is on the accuser, and the accused are innocent until PROVEN guilty. This is definitely circumstantial evidence, but nothing concrete on its own. All things can depend on the judge, too, but what they really need are the system logs that show the exact activity that was taking place, to be conclusive. But if they could get the video in front of a court, and make them testify what they were doing, it might lead to something, but not concrete on its own. Thanks.