Replies

Seriously, I just flipped through page after page of your FR comments. I stopped speed reading them after five pages into them. ALL Zelensky/Ukraine worship, ALL anti-Putin agitprop of the most ham handed kind (the kind designed to gin up mindless hatred for another human being), ALL the time. Post after post after post, ad nauseum. No posts about anything else until around six pages in. Around page 12-13 of your posts you'll see a smattering of posts on other topics but still, it's mostly Denys Davydov, neocons and/or MSM pro-Ukraine propaganda sources again and again and again. If that's not indicative of maniacal behavior, then the word has no meaning.

Why are you so obsessed with Ukraine?

Why are you not as obsessed about US issues such as late term abortion or the mutilation and sexualization of American children? Why are you not blast-posting articles about how every institution in America has been turned into a weapon against decent, traditional Americans?

America is your country! It is America, not Ukraine, you should be most concerned about. Why, instead, are you so blindly loyal to a massively corrupt foreign country led by a gay dancing puppet who advocates for the LGBTYHNBV^&%^ agenda and who is stridently supported by all of the world's worst anti-West, anti-Christian, anti-Conservative. anti-US and pro-homosexual agenda individuals and groups on the planet?

I do not disrespect you nor consider you an enemy because we have some differing political concerns.

Perhaps, this research article I have shared may give insight into comments that reveal such angry perceptions:

“An existential function of ‘enemyship’: evidence that people attribute INFLUENCE to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20175623/

“Perceiving oneself as having powerful enemies, although superficially disagreeable, may serve an important psychological function. On the basis of E. Becker’s (1969) existential theorizing, the authors argue that people attribute exaggerated influence to enemies as a means of compensating for perceptions of reduced control over their environment.

In Study 1, individuals dispositionally low in perceived control responded to a reminder of external hazards by attributing more influence to a personal enemy.

In Study 2, a situational threat to control over external hazard strengthened participants’ belief in the conspiratorial power of a political enemy. Examining moderators and outcomes of this process,

Study 3 showed that participants were especially likely to attribute influence over life events to an enemy when the broader social system appeared disordered, and

Study 4 showed that perceiving an ambiguously powerful enemy under conditions of control threat decreased perceptions of external risk and bolstered feelings of personal control.”