Posted on 04/06/2023 9:34:08 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
When a prosecutor takes the historically unprecedented step of indicting an American former president, especially one who is also a presidential candidate, then he better make damn sure he has a rock solid case. Unfortunately it appears that New York District Attorney has such an incredibly weak case that even very liberal New York magazine in its Intelligencer section has serious doubts about it, as you can see revealed by Ankush Khardori on Friday in an article with the downbeat title of "Michael Cohen Is Already Undermining the Trump Prosecution."
To emphasize the point the subtitle states, "Immediately after the indictment, he says he didn’t really mean his guilty plea."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Is Georgia the one with the CRAZY ASS WITCH as the Jury FORMAN???
i think it was the only one close enough to be leaked
the leak happened right after biden’s bank records came out
the arrest wasnt until two weeks later
they needed something
Maybe Michael Cohen should of used a better lawyer…. 🤣🤣🤣
yea..
omg....laughable.
They timed the announcement to occur the same day the House and Senate went into Easter recess, so that Congresscritters would find it more difficult to react as a unit to the news, or bring the issue up in the well of either chamber.
They timed the arrest and arraignment to occur the day before Passover and the Tuesday of Holy Week, so that more people would be able to watch their TV screens as they perp-walked THE BAD MAN OF THE CENTURY! in the news capital of the world.
If everything worked out, they would have dealt Trump their knockout blow while covering up all the exploding info on the Biden Crime Syndicate. If nothing worked out, the fizzling of the indictment would occur during Passover and Passion weekend, when most people would be either worshipping, or enjoying the extra days off and not watching the news.
Good old Lanny Pakistani. Still carrying water for the corrupt globalist/leftist cabal.
That sounds bizarre. Do you have a link to that interview?
Listen here. I started at about 50 minutes to discuss Bragg’s case, but, to your point, it gets relevant at prox. 59 minutes.
Yes, you can hear Viva Frei bring up the other cases followed by Robert Barnes stating that the other cases are actually WEAKER starting at the 26 minute mark HERE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.