[Bruce Campbells Chin]

You're the guy who doesn't believe in the rule of law. There is no Constitutional basis for the Court to order the relief requested. The Court would be just making up that authority out of thin air just because you want that result.

If you believed in the rule of law, you'd be looking for provision in the Constitution that authorizes the Supreme Court to remove members of Congress or the President. No such provision exists.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

You believe that elected officials have sovereign immunity from being prosecuted for their crimes.

Doesn’t sound like you believe in the rule of law to me.

[philman_36]

There is no Constitutional basis for the Court to order the relief requested.

You're telling me to read about the SG taking over the case when you don't even know that the writ states exactly where and what the Constitutional basis is.

Do you need me to point out the exact words or can you find them yourself?
Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams, et al.